search for: 8ce4d4ae

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Jul 25, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Anton Lokhmotov wrote: > > There is an issue with representing opaque types in LLVM IR modules: if > two > > modules are using the same opaque type (which is only going to be > > specialised at some later stage), it is only identified by its name. But >

On Jul 25, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Anton Lokhmotov wrote: > There is an issue with representing opaque types in LLVM IR modules: if two > modules are using the same opaque type (which is only going to be > specialised at some later stage), it is only identified by its name. But > the current module linker "resolves" this as if there is a name clash, and > one of that opaque

...you mean. LLVM is perfectly fine with opaque structs so long as you don't "deference" them, GEP into them, need their size, etc. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110725/8ce4d4ae/attachment.html>