search for: 8bda9d8c

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "8bda9d8c".

2010 Sep 05
2
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?
...rated into the coalescer algorithm. It is more of an afterthought, calling RemoveCopyByCommutingDef when a copy could otherwise not be removed. /jakob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100905/8bda9d8c/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1929 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100905/8bda9d8c/attachment.bin>
2010 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Borja Ferrer wrote: > >> I've noticed this pattern happening with other operators aswell, but used xor in this example. As i said before, i tried with different register allocation orders, but it will produce always the same result. GCC is emitting longer
2010 Sep 04
3
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?
On Sep 4, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Borja Ferrer wrote: > I've noticed this pattern happening with other operators aswell, but used xor in this example. As i said before, i tried with different register allocation orders, but it will produce always the same result. GCC is emitting longer code, but since LLVM is so nearer to the optimal code sequence i wanted to reach it. In LLVM, copies are