search for: 8b9fb8c

...error code is returned instead of calling BUG_ON when btrfs_previous_item returns the error. Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 8b9fb8c..c95b214 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -983,14 +983,14 @@ static int btrfs_free_dev_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (ret > 0) { ret = btrfs_previous_item(root, path, key.objectid, BTRFS_DEV_EXTENT_KEY); - BUG_ON(ret); + if (ret) + goto o...

''bh'' is forgot to release if no error is detected Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 8b9fb8c..69fc902 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -631,6 +631,7 @@ static int __btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, list_add(&device->dev_alloc_list, &fs_devices->alloc_list); } + brelse(bh); continue; error_brelse: -- 1.7.4....

In a multi device setup, the chunk allocator currently always allocates chunks on the devices in the same order. This leads to a very uneven distribution, especially with RAID1 or RAID10 and an uneven number of devices. This patch always sorts the devices before allocating, and allocates the stripes on the devices with the most available space, as long as there is enough space available. In a low

In a multi device setup, the chunk allocator currently always allocates chunks on the devices in the same order. This leads to a very uneven distribution, especially with RAID1 or RAID10 and an uneven number of devices. This patch always sorts the devices before allocating, and allocates the stripes on the devices with the most available space, as long as there is enough space available. In a low