Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "8b207b01".
2013 Nov 27
0
[LLVMdev] Bug in Language Reference? %0 versus %1 as starting index.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:02:53AM +0100, Mikael Lyngvig wrote:
> The language reference states that local temporaries begin with index 0,
> but if I try that on my not-entirely-up-to-date v3.4 llc (it is like a week
> old), I get an error "instruction expected to be numbered '%1'".
>
If you don't label the entry block, then you will get this error. I
think it
2013 Nov 27
4
[LLVMdev] Bug in Language Reference? %0 versus %1 as starting index.
The language reference states that local temporaries begin with index 0,
but if I try that on my not-entirely-up-to-date v3.4 llc (it is like a week
old), I get an error "instruction expected to be numbered '%1'".
Also, quite a few examples in the LR uses %0 as a local identifier.
Should I fix those or is it a problem in llc?
-- Mikael
-------------- next part --------------