search for: 8aba

...//b Oct 20 17:18:19 VERBOSE[19772] logger.c: -- ISDN2#02: Updated channel name: CAPI/ISDN2/32xx11-8ab8 Oct 20 17:18:19 VERBOSE[2663] logger.c: -- ISDN4#02: Updated channel name: CAPI/ISDN4/1-8ab9 Oct 20 17:18:19 VERBOSE[2663] logger.c: -- ISDN4#02: Updated channel name: CAPI/ISDN4/11-8aba Oct 20 17:18:26 VERBOSE[19772] logger.c: > ISDN4#02: CAPI INFO 0x34e6: Recovery on timer expiry Oct 20 17:18:26 VERBOSE[2663] logger.c: == ISDN4#02: CAPI Hangingup for PLCI=0x104 in state 4 Oct 20 17:18:26 VERBOSE[2663] logger.c: == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)...

...g happens> I tried version 2.6.9 (ubuntu) and 3.0.2 (fedora 9), both have the same result. Is it me or is this unwanted behaviour? When I ssh to the machine using -4, I can log in. -- Gijs Molenaar gijs.molenaar@surfnet.nl http://gijs.pythonic.nl fingerprint C660 BABA 4B91 4B5C EB60 7739 4385 8ABA 72EE 99CA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20080530/24734425/signature.bin

...ion with dmcrypt and LUKS during the install stage of CentOS 5.1? I use Debian Etch at the moment and Debian is able to to this. If not possible, are there any good guides that anyone knows about that explain how to dmcrypt everything but /boot on CentOS manually? --andrew -- GnuPG Key ID: ECB18ABA Fingerprint: FDF3 91FC F5BC 1164 E217 315E 337E 219B ECB1 8ABA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/atta...

...8 scope host lo ??? inet6 ::1/128 scope host 2: ens3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000 ??? link/ether 52:54:00:86:8a:ba brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff ??? inet 192.168.20.22/24 brd 192.168.20.255 scope global ens3 ??? inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fe86:8aba/64 scope link 3: ens10: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000 ??? link/ether 52:54:00:43:10:d2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff ??? inet 10.0.103.13/24 brd 10.0.103.255 scope global ens10 ??? inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fe43:10d2/64 scope link -----------...

...only power off with the button. I will probably look for this on bug tracker and log a bug report if I don't find a similar case, but I wanted to mail the list first (because it's easier) and ask if anyone knows of the issue and how to get around it? thanks, andrew -- GnuPG Key ID: ECB18ABA Fingerprint: FDF3 91FC F5BC 1164 E217 315E 337E 219B ECB1 8ABA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/atta...

...1/128 scope host > 2: ens3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast > state UP group default qlen 1000 > ??? link/ether 52:54:00:86:8a:ba brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > ??? inet 192.168.20.22/24 brd 192.168.20.255 scope global ens3 > ??? inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fe86:8aba/64 scope link > 3: ens10: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast > state UP group default qlen 1000 > ??? link/ether 52:54:00:43:10:d2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > ??? inet 10.0.103.13/24 brd 10.0.103.255 scope global ens10 > ??? inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fe43:10d2...

...sbin/sshd from create access on the tcp_socket . For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l c5d4049e-cffb-4cfb-a243-135c7b297e8b Jul 9 09:22:44 inet02 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/sshd from open access on the chr_file 5. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l d77a3254-8aba-4a13-bd78-0bcf14e67035 /var/log/secure Jul 9 09:22:34 inet02 sshd[17681]: error: socket: Permission denied Jul 9 09:22:34 inet02 sshd[17684]: error: /dev/pts/5: Permission denied # grep sshd /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow #============= chroot_user_t ============== #!!!! This av...

Hello, We are setting up 2 AD machines: New machine with subnet 192.168.1.21: Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.buster Bind version 9.11.5 Existing machine 1 with subnet 192.168.2.21 Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.stretch Bind version 9.10.3 Existing machine 2 with subnet 192.168.3.21? Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.stretch Bind version 9.10.3 All with BIND_DLZ backend, same