Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "8a3239c5".
2011 Dec 07
0
[LLVMdev] Comments on the bundle proposal
...ected code
> sequences, as opposed to having every instruction belong to some bundle.
Yes, I'm sure Evan's approach will support this.
-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111207/8a3239c5/attachment.html>
2011 Dec 06
4
[LLVMdev] Comments on the bundle proposal
I just signed up to this mailing list so I don't have the original email
with the proposal to reply to. I got the text forwarded to me though,
and here are my thoughts on it:
- The requirement that it should be easy for a pass to be oblivious to
bundles isn't well defined. If this means that a pass should be able to
run as if the bundles weren't present, then such a pass can easily