search for: 89db

...imilar overall loudness. Admittedly this isn't common. Files using the original replaygain algorithm with a reference loudness of 83dB are now very rare, but R128 tags are starting to show up (eg. in Opus) and these play at a significantly different (quieter) level to tracks adjusted with the 89dB reference loudness tags. However the volume changes between the two different tagging systems are so dramatic that it is helpful to provide an automatic method of normalising them at least approximately. While adding the option for R128 gain into metaflac (and/or flac) would certainly be useful,...

Hi has anyone looked at adding R128gain code to metaflac so we can select to use this calculation for RP tags rather than replay gain? Best regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20140615/1c1ca9c9/attachment.htm

...ess. Admittedly this isn't > common. Files using the original replaygain algorithm with a reference > loudness of 83dB are now very rare, but R128 tags are starting to show up > (eg. in Opus) and these play at a significantly different (quieter) level to > tracks adjusted with the 89dB reference loudness tags. a) According to David Robinson, "ReplayGain tags should always be quoted relative to 89dB". So all files that were scanned 10 years ago with a reference level == 83dB should be fixed. And IMHO it's a good idea. b) According to http://wiki.xiph.org/OggOpus#Co...

Hello. CE wrote: > Hails! The reason this occurs is the default adjust value for > mp3gain is stupid. I always do an mp3gain -g 6 to mine after other > adjustments. Also with a player like XMMS that uses the FLAC plugin > you can control the volume the flac play back at. So what exact dB value does flac use? mp3gain + 6 dB are 95 dB IIRC. I tried to apply mp3gain -m 6 to my mp3s,