search for: 8973

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8973 Summary: --delete or similar (--delete-after / --delete-before) does not work if used after --rsh Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority...

This patch implements the current consensus of PR8973: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8973. The macro llvm_unreachable is used in LLVM to indicate that a particular place in a function is not supposed to be reachable during execution. Like an assert macro, it takes a string argument. In +Asserts builds, this string argument, together with s...

Hi John, > This patch implements the current consensus of PR8973: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8973. > > The macro llvm_unreachable is used in LLVM to indicate that > a particular place in a function is not supposed to be reachable > during execution. Like an assert macro, it takes a string > argument. In +Asserts builds, this string...

...apps/thoth/current root 8972 8971 0 13:37 ? 00:00:00 /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -e production -p 8020 -a 127.0.0.1 -l /var/www/apps/thoth/current/log/mongrel.log -P /var/www/apps/thoth/current/log/mongrel.8020.pid -c /var/www/apps/thoth/current root 8973 8972 0 13:37 ? 00:00:00 /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -e production -p 8020 -a 127.0.0.1 -l /var/www/apps/thoth/current/log/mongrel.log -P /var/www/apps/thoth/current/log/mongrel.8020.pid -c /var/www/apps/thoth/current root 8975 8919 0 13:37 pts/0 00:0...

This patch implements the current consensus of PR8973: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8973. The macro llvm_unreachable is used in LLVM to indicate that a particular place in a function is not supposed to be reachable during execution. Like an assert macro, it takes a string argument. In +Asserts builds, this string argument, together with s...

On 12.03.2011, at 11:17, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi John, > >> This patch implements the current consensus of PR8973: >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8973. >> >> The macro llvm_unreachable is used in LLVM to indicate that >> a particular place in a function is not supposed to be reachable >> during execution. Like an assert macro, it takes a string >> argument. In +Ass...

...1.9, 97.76, 97.76, 164, 164, 244, 244, 303.5, 303.5, 388, 388, 59.8, 59.8, 227.5, 227.5, 165, 165, 19.15, 19.15, 651, 651, 195, 195, 190, 190, 164, 164, 190, 190, 334, 334)), .Names = c("N_Type", "AdRes"), row.names = c("8956", "8957", "8972", "8973", "8974", "8975", "8976", "8977", "8978", "8979", "8980", "8981", "8982", "8983", "8984", "8985", "9159", "9160", "9175", "9176", &quo...

...\_ /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D --option=server role check:inhibit=yes --foreground 15161 ? S 0:00 | \_ /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D --option=server role check:inhibit=yes --foreground 2573 ? S 0:35 \_ samba 8972 ? S 0:00 | \_ samba 8973 ? S 0:00 | \_ samba 2575 ? S 0:06 \_ samba 2577 ? S 0:00 \_ samba 2578 ? S 0:07 \_ samba 9411 ? S 0:00 | \_ samba 9412 ? S 0:00 | \_ samba 2579 ? S 0:02 \_ samba 2580 ? S 0:09 \_ sam...

Hi Sebastian, >>> This patch implements the current consensus of PR8973: >>> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8973. >>> >>> The macro llvm_unreachable is used in LLVM to indicate that >>> a particular place in a function is not supposed to be reachable >>> during execution. Like an assert macro, it takes a string >&gt...

...saying twice! :) Sounds great, and I completely agree it's a nice enhancement to what we can effectively express to help the compiler optimize more effectively. Thanks for doing this. -Jim On Mar 11, 2011, at 6:55 PM, John McCall wrote: > This patch implements the current consensus of PR8973: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8973. > > The macro llvm_unreachable is used in LLVM to indicate that > a particular place in a function is not supposed to be reachable > during execution. Like an assert macro, it takes a string > argument. In +Asserts builds, this st...

.../usr/sbin/asterisk -U asterisk -G asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 855 0.0 6.4 93668 58120 ? S Nov14 0:00 /usr/sbin/asterisk -U asterisk -G asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 1983 0.0 6.5 94380 58944 ? S Nov14 0:00 /usr/sbin/asterisk -U asterisk -G asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 8973 0.0 6.8 97764 61560 ? S Nov14 0:00 /usr/sbin/asterisk -U asterisk -G asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 9486 0.0 6.9 98020 62948 ? S Nov14 0:00 /usr/sbin/asterisk -U asterisk -G asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 10415 0.0 6.9 99956 63320 ? S Nov14 0:00 /usr/sbin/as...

Hi folks. If I am indexing ModelA and ModelB and I want to search both of them, I usually just pick one arbitrarily and use it for #multi_search. Is there a slicker pattern, regarding from which model to invoke #multi_search? Can it be invoked directly from the Ferret library? Has anyone put together some sort of "dummy" search class? Thanks for any ideas. John

...this long-standing bug. Please let me know if I can be of any more help. -Garret -- Garret W. Huntress System Administrator / System Developer Geophysical Laboratory Carnegie Institution of Washington 5251 Broad Branch Road, NW Washington, DC 20015 Email: ghuntress at ciw.edu Phone: (202)-478-8973 AIM: Garret Huntress -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070119/95f9d9ff/attachment-0002.html>

...Upgrading to rc24 did not resolve the issue, but reverting to rc22 has. -Garret -- Garret W. Huntress System Administrator / System Developer Geophysical Laboratory Carnegie Institution of Washington 5251 Broad Branch Road, NW Washington, DC 20015 Email: ghuntress at ciw.edu Phone: (202)-478-8973 AIM: Garret Huntress ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070227/aa2ba44d/attachment-0004.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Garret Huntre...

...-0.025 2 9451 945 945 0.1625 2.6125 -0.025 2 9767 946 946 0.1625 2.6375 -0.025 2 9200 947 947 0.1625 2.6625 -0.025 2 8677 948 948 0.1625 2.6875 -0.025 2 8301 949 949 0.1625 2.7125 -0.025 2 8122 950 950 0.1625 2.7375 -0.025 2 8973 951 951 0.1625 2.7625 -0.025 2 10284 952 952 0.1625 2.7875 -0.025 2 10889 953 953 0.1625 2.8125 -0.025 2 10510 954 954 0.1625 2.8375 -0.025 2 9962 955 955 0.1625 2.8625 -0.025 2 9917 956 956 0.1625 2.8875 -0.025 2 9816 957 957 0.1625...

Windows authentication extends far beyond the CIFS protocol the Samba implements, but it only very recently that work has been done to catch up to Microsoft's extensions in this area. This has caused many administrators pain and toil that their MS counterparts simply don't have. For them, authentication 'just works', with single-sign-on and the lot. I have worked, for over a

Hello Everyone,   Learning about R and its wonderful array of functions. If it's not obvious, I usually try to find out what a function stands for. I think this helps me remember better.   One function that has me stumped is "sink." Can anyone tell me if this stands for something?   Thanks,   Paul         __________________________________________________ [[alternative HTML