search for: 8929

I guess my problem is simple for most of you but I am new with R and I need some help, I have a dataframe : CELLCD AreaProtected 8928 52.39389 8928 41.91511 8929 21.21975 8929 63.65925 8930 26.08547 8930 14.04602 I wouldlike to sum the AreaProtected if it is the same CELLCD in another column : CELLCD AreaProtected SumAreaProtected 8928 52.39389 94.309 8928 41.91511 8929 21.21975 84,879 8...

Thanks Rowland for the advice, I have now tried joining a 4.9.2 machine to the domain, targeting the join at a 4.9.2 DC. Same result as below, unfortunately - I think you are probably correct with the bug below (#8929). On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 08:34, Jonathan Hunter <jmhunter1 at gmail.com> wrote: [...] > > > $ sudo samba-tool domain join mydomain.org DC -U myadmin --site=mysite > > > --server=dc3 > > > [...] > > > Replicating critical objects from the base DN of the dom...

...index on servicePrincipalName, duplicate of objectGUID > > 00000000-1111-2222-3333-444444444444 in > > @INDEX:SERVICEPRINCIPALNAME:RESTRICTEDKRBHOST/SOMEPC > > [lots of these] > > I think you may be running into this bug: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8929 > > You may have duplicate SPN's e.g. one 'HOST/somePC' and another > 'host/somepc' You could well be right, thank you. It's entirely possible - my domain has been upgraded through various samba versions so that might be the case. Looks like this is an old bug, so...

...tion of Samba, 2 SPN entries appear > > computer_name.example.com > > CUMPUTER_NAME.example.com > > And on the windows side, there is a replication error, since by the logic of Windows DC it is 2 identical recordsds > > This is bug https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8929 > > The last effort was in this thread: > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-January/124878.html > > Andrew Bartlett > > -- > Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ > Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba...

Good afternoon. how to overcome the problem, samba creates an SPN in the format computer_name.example.com (computer name in lower case) and Windows registers as CUMPUTER_NAME.example.com (computer name in uppercase). When synchronizing in the direction of Samba, 2 SPN entries appear computer_name.example.com CUMPUTER_NAME.example.com And on the windows side, there is a replication error, since by

...> computer_name.example.com > > > > CUMPUTER_NAME.example.com > > > > And on the windows side, there is a replication error, since by the logic of Windows DC it is 2 identical recordsds > > > > > > This is bug https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8929 > > > > > > The last effort was in this thread: > > > > > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-January/124878.html > > > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > > > > > -- > > > Andrew Bartlett...

...7 532 9.8 2340 2340 1733 288 384 16.6 2352 2352 17358 1694 3511 9.8 2356 2356 15034 1780 10990 11.8 2359 2359 15907 1731 6464 10.9 8924 8924 639 160 103 25.0 8929 8929 734 107 66 14.6 8937 8937 2688 527 414 19.6 8932 8932 858 93 96 10.8 Y quiero graficar las 4 variables juntas. Creo que casi casi casi lo logro, salvo por (a) la barra de caps$PersonasRCVG, que pareciera cam...

...ing bug is all the same thing. >> >> What happened is that in the past we did not reject: >> >> servicePrincipalName: HOST/foo >> servicePrincipalName: host/foo > > To further tie threads together, that would be: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8929 > >> Then with 4.8 the index code rejected this. With master for 4.9 we >> decided it wasn't the index code's job to do this, so fixed that (it >> helped another use case). >> >> Add to this the upgrade code for GUID indexes didn't assert that if the...

Hi, After a recent hardware failure where I did not have a working backup, I am trying to re-create one of my DCs (DC1). This is a Samba 4.9.0 environment throughout. I have DC1 (the one that is hopefully being re-joined), but also DC2, DC3 and DC4 which are still present, and these have not experienced issues. After running the following: $ sudo samba-tool domain join mydomain.org DC -U myadmin

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 16:10 -0400, Justin Foreman wrote: > Okay. The master build worked on the join. Excellent. So it was 4.8.0 having a problem. > > I’ve attempted to join 2008 R2 now to 4.8.0 but it still blue screens. Should I start a new thread for clarity’s sake? So, I think this, the upgrade issues and even the old servicePrincipalName handling bug is all the same thing. What

...ies appear > > > computer_name.example.com > > > CUMPUTER_NAME.example.com > > > And on the windows side, there is a replication error, since by the logic of Windows DC it is 2 identical recordsds > > > > This is bug https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8929 > > > > The last effort was in this thread: > > > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-January/124878.html > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > > > -- > > Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ > >...

...it's working properly.. my test script for freeradius > (which I run on each DC) fails on DC1. > > Any pointers/advice would be appreciated, as always! > > Thanks :) > > Jonathan > I think you may be running into this bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8929 You may have duplicate SPN's e.g. one 'HOST/somePC' and another 'host/somepc' Also there were several problems with 4.9.0, so I would rapidly upgrade to 4.9.2 Rowland

...sm >= 0.98.35, perl BuildPrereq: nasm >= 0.98.22, perl to get it compile in rh 7.3 (yep, it's old but in internal network.) Thank you - for all you're work. BR, Juha -- tuomala at netnix.fi www.netnix.fi Valkj?rventie 1, 02130 Espoo, Finland. +358 40 589 8929

...old > servicePrincipalName handling bug is all the same thing. > > What happened is that in the past we did not reject: > > servicePrincipalName: HOST/foo > servicePrincipalName: host/foo To further tie threads together, that would be: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8929 > Then with 4.8 the index code rejected this. With master for 4.9 we > decided it wasn't the index code's job to do this, so fixed that (it > helped another use case). > > Add to this the upgrade code for GUID indexes didn't assert that if the > re-index failed tha...

....my.domain.com> > Server DN name ?: CN=NTDS > Settings,CN=DC2,CN=Servers,CN=mydomain,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=com > TransportType: RPC > options: 0x00000001 > Warning: No NC replicated for Connection! > Connection -- > Connection name: 365283e3-885d-4610-8929-91e3372530da > Enabled ? ? ? ?: TRUE > Server DNS name : dc1.my.domain.com <http://dc1.my.domain.com> > Server DN name ?: CN=NTDS > Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=mydomain,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=com > TransportType: RPC > options: 0x00000001 > Warnin...

Hello, Attempting to run samba-tool domain backup online --server=pfdc1.domain.local --targetdir=/backups/ -U administrator gives the following errors. Pre-loading the Samba 4 and AD schema Unable to determine the DomainSID, can not enforce uniqueness constraint on local domainSIDs Partition[DC=domain,DC=local] objects[1716/1738] linked_values[0/839] ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:2352:

...bled : TRUE Server DNS name : dc2.my.domain.com Server DN name : CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC2,CN=Servers,CN=mydomain,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=com TransportType: RPC options: 0x00000001 Warning: No NC replicated for Connection! Connection -- Connection name: 365283e3-885d-4610-8929-91e3372530da Enabled : TRUE Server DNS name : dc1.my.domain.com Server DN name : CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=mydomain,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=com TransportType: RPC options: 0x00000001 Warning: No NC replicated for Connection! Connection -- ERROR(<type '...

Hi everyone, samba-tool dbcheck --reindex Re-indexing... ../ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:2352: duplicate attribute value in CN=WSTEST,OU=vm,OU=computers,OU=test,DC=ad,DC=test,DC=it for index on servicePrincipalName, duplicate of objectGUID 4c723426-73f8-4991-bf95-88eb57840c2c in @INDEX:SERVICEPRINCIPALNAME:TERMSRV/WSTEST.AD.TEST.IT Looking at the computer entry, I indeed have thoses two SPN (notice

...=/var/spool/mail/index/person at mydomain.com, control=, inbox= host dovecot: auth(default): master out: USER 1 person at mydomain.com user=person~mydomain.com uid=501 gid=12 host deliver(person at mydomain.com): msgid=<20081121103114.5B449EA2C6 at host>: saved mail to INBOX host postfix/pipe[8929]: 5B449EA2C6: to=<person at mydomain.com>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.69, delays=0.19/0.02/0/0.48, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dovecot service) host postfix/qmgr[8894]: 5B449EA2C6: removed What I don't get is that since I use userdb (read mail log lines marked (#0-3) and the &quo...

> > Good, the _msdcs domain is the forest domain So is it normal that DC4 is not in that? > but are there records for all three DCs in: > > DC=your.domain.com > ,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=your,DC=domain,DC=com > I tried to find this path in the LDAP Browser and ASDI Edit but I did not manage in find it. In the Windows DNS Manager connected to DC1 I found _ldap