search for: 880441

...> apparmor one. > > Rowland Rowland, Thanks for responding. From http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/linux/linux_4.13.13-1_changelog [ Ben Hutchings ] * linux-image: Recommend apparmor, as systemd units with an AppArmor profile will fail without it (Closes: #880441) So, although the word "recommend" implies that one has a choice, in reality, the kernel upgrade would not proceed without installing apparmor. I suppose it would be possible to disable, but assuming the systemd warning is a harbinger of things to come, it seemed best to me to figure...

...r responding. >> >> From >> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/linux/linux_4.13.13-1_changelog >> >> [ Ben Hutchings ] >> * linux-image: Recommend apparmor, as systemd units with an >> AppArmor profile will fail without it (Closes: #880441) >> >> So, although the word "recommend" implies that one has a choice, in >> reality, the kernel upgrade would not proceed without installing >> apparmor. > Then it is a bug, depend means it will be installed, recommend means > what it says, it is recommende...

...<http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/linux/linux_4.13.13-1_changelog> > > [ Ben Hutchings ] >     * linux-image: Recommend apparmor, as systemd units > with an > AppArmor profile will fail without it (Closes: #880441) > > So, although the word "recommend" implies that one has a > choice, in > reality, the kernel upgrade would not proceed without > installing > apparmor. > > Then it is a bug, depend means it wil...

...land, > > Thanks for responding. > > From > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/linux/linux_4.13.13-1_changelog > > [ Ben Hutchings ] > * linux-image: Recommend apparmor, as systemd units with an > AppArmor profile will fail without it (Closes: #880441) > > So, although the word "recommend" implies that one has a choice, in > reality, the kernel upgrade would not proceed without installing > apparmor. Then it is a bug, depend means it will be installed, recommend means what it says, it is recommended to install it, but yo...

...13.13-1_changelog            <http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/linux/linux_4.13.13-1_changelog>            [ Ben Hutchings ]                * linux-image: Recommend apparmor, as systemd units            with an            AppArmor profile will fail without it (Closes: #880441)            So, although the word "recommend" implies that one has a            choice, in            reality, the kernel upgrade would not proceed without            installing            apparmor.        Then it is a bug, depend means it will be installed, recommend        means      ...

...om >>> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/linu >>> x/linux_4.13.13-1_changelog >>> >>> [ Ben Hutchings ] >>> * linux-image: Recommend apparmor, as systemd units with an >>> AppArmor profile will fail without it (Closes: #880441) >>> >>> So, although the word "recommend" implies that one has a choice, in >>> reality, the kernel upgrade would not proceed without installing >>> apparmor. >>> >> Then it is a bug, depend means it will be installed, recommend means &g...

...master.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/linux/linux_4.13.13-1_changelog> > > > > [ Ben Hutchings ] > >     * linux-image: Recommend apparmor, as systemd units > > with an > > AppArmor profile will fail without it (Closes: #880441) > > > > So, although the word "recommend" implies that one has a > > choice, in > > reality, the kernel upgrade would not proceed without > > installing > > apparmor. > > > >...

Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because systemd needs it.  Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - due to apparmor failures with bind_dlz. Here is the initial journalctl results: Nov 23 10:12:12 debpdc named[16080]: starting BIND 9.10.6-Debian <id:9d1ea0b> -f -u bind Nov 23 10:12:12 debpdc