search for: 87a0037574e4

...s(+), 6 deletions(-) Christoph, Russell, could either of you provide an Acked-by for this? I think it makes the most sense for Ben to pick this up into the Nouveau tree along with patch 2/2. Thierry > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c > index af27f1c22d93..87a0037574e4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c > @@ -1151,6 +1151,11 @@ int arm_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) > return __dma_supported(dev, mask, false); > } > > +static const struct dma_map_ops *arm_get_dma_map_ops(bool coherent)...

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> An unfortunate interaction between the 32-bit ARM DMA/IOMMU mapping code and Tegra SMMU driver changes to support IOMMU groups introduced a boot- time regression on Tegra124. This was caught very late because none of the standard configurations that are tested on Tegra enable the ARM DMA/ IOMMU mapping code since it is not needed. The reason for

...reding at nvidia.com> --- Changes in v4: - new patch to fix existing arm_iommu_detach_device() to do what we need arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c index af27f1c22d93..87a0037574e4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c @@ -1151,6 +1151,11 @@ int arm_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) return __dma_supported(dev, mask, false); } +static const struct dma_map_ops *arm_get_dma_map_ops(bool coherent) +{ + return coherent ? &arm_coh...