Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "8783,6".
Did you mean:
7883,6
2017 Jul 21
0
[PATCH v2 15/23] daemon: Reimplement ‘btrfs_subvolume_list’ and ‘btrfs_subvolume_get_default’ in OCaml.
...e_or_Path, "fs")], [];
+ impl = OCaml "Btrfs.btrfs_subvolume_list";
optional = Some "btrfs"; camel_name = "BTRFSSubvolumeList";
test_excuse = "tested in tests/btrfs";
shortdesc = "list btrfs snapshots and subvolumes";
@@ -8783,6 +8784,7 @@ This uses the L<blockdev(8)> command." };
{ defaults with
name = "btrfs_subvolume_get_default"; added = (1, 29, 17);
style = RInt64 "id", [String (Mountable_or_Path, "fs")], [];
+ impl = OCaml "Btrfs.btrfs_subvolume_get_defa...
[PATCH 18/27] daemon: Reimplement ‘btrfs_subvolume_list’ and ‘btrfs_subvolume_get_default’ in OCaml.
2017 Jul 14
0
[PATCH 18/27] daemon: Reimplement ‘btrfs_subvolume_list’ and ‘btrfs_subvolume_get_default’ in OCaml.
...e_or_Path, "fs")], [];
+ impl = OCaml "Btrfs.btrfs_subvolume_list";
optional = Some "btrfs"; camel_name = "BTRFSSubvolumeList";
test_excuse = "tested in tests/btrfs";
shortdesc = "list btrfs snapshots and subvolumes";
@@ -8783,6 +8784,7 @@ This uses the L<blockdev(8)> command." };
{ defaults with
name = "btrfs_subvolume_get_default"; added = (1, 29, 17);
style = RInt64 "id", [String (Mountable_or_Path, "fs")], [];
+ impl = OCaml "Btrfs.btrfs_subvolume_get_defa...
2020 May 07
17
[PATCH v4 00/15] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory
This series is based on v5.7-rc4. The patches are located at:
https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-v4
This is basically a resend of v3 [1], now based on v5.7-rc4 and restested.
One patch was reshuffled and two ACKs I missed to add were added. The
rebase did not require any modifications to patches.
Details about virtio-mem can be found in the cover letter of v2 [2]. A
2017 Jun 05
19
[PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
v2 was here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00008.html
This series gets as far as a working (and faster) reimplementation of
‘guestfs_list_filesystems’.
I also have another patch series on top of this one which reimplements
the inspection APIs inside the daemon, but that needs a bit more work
still, since inspection turns out to be a very large piece of code.
Rich.
2017 Jul 27
23
[PATCH v3 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
I think this fixes everything mentioned:
- Added the Optgroups module as suggested.
- Remove command temporary files.
- Replace command ~flags with ?fold_stdout_on_stderr.
- Nest _with_mounted function.
- Rebase & retest.
Rich.
2017 Jul 21
27
[PATCH v2 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
v1 was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html
This series now depends on two small patches which I posted separately:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html
v1 -> v2:
- Previously changes to generator/daemon.ml were made incrementally
through the patch
2017 Jul 14
45
[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
Previously posted as part of the mega utilities/inspection
series here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00232.html
What I've done is to extract just the parts related to rewriting
daemon APIs in OCaml, rebase them on top of the current master, fix a
few things, and recompile and test everything.
Rich.
2017 Jun 12
32
[PATCH v5 00/32] Refactor utilities, implement some APIs in OCaml.
This is a combination of:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00046.html
[PATCH 00/12] Refactor utility functions.
plus:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00023.html
[PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
with the second patches rebased on top of the utility refactoring, and
some other adjustments and extensions.
This passes
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html
and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html
Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm
intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new
virt-inspector to see if I can find any
2017 Jun 15
45
[PATCH v6 00/41] Refactor utilities, reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v5:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html
Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux
and Windows guests.
Rich.
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html
I believe this addresses all comments received so far.
Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images
processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is
identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid