Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "8708a06e".
Did you mean:
8708.06
2011 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> A new patch is attached that is *much* less of a rough draft. Sorry for any confusion due to the early state of the patch.
Thanks, Chandler. This is great stuff.
> Still, I never intended this to be on-by-default at first. This is a starting point, that I hope can be improved into something that is on-by-default eventually, but
2011 Oct 20
2
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
Thanks for all of the comments Andy and Jakob. A new patch is attached that
is *much* less of a rough draft. Sorry for any confusion due to the early
state of the patch.
Also, many many thanks to Jakob for his explanation of how the branches
between MBBs should be handled, and Andy, Jim, and Eric who helped answer my
questions on IRC when I ran into stumbling blocks. Also, Nick, who shoulder
2011 Oct 21
3
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
...es. I'll
probably have some questions for you and/or andy about exactly how that
should work, whether CodePlacementOpt is doing the right thing, etc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111020/8708a06e/attachment.html>