Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "86ec5f4e".
2008 Oct 15
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 problem? (resend)
On Oct 15, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>> True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used, not
>> the value.
>
> Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can
> understand that it is surprising that they do, but determining whether
> this is legal or not requires reading the language standard.
> Hopefully
> a
2008 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 problem? (resend)
On Oct 15, 2008, at 12:00 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote:
>
> On Oct 15, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>
>>> True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used,
>>> not
>>> the value.
>>
>> Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can
>> understand that it is surprising that they do, but
2008 Oct 15
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 problem? (resend)
...inker will perform this optimization.
---
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081015/86ec5f4e/attachment.html>