search for: 86ec5f4e

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "86ec5f4e".

2008 Oct 15
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 problem? (resend)
On Oct 15, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used, not >> the value. > > Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can > understand that it is surprising that they do, but determining whether > this is legal or not requires reading the language standard. > Hopefully > a
2008 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 problem? (resend)
On Oct 15, 2008, at 12:00 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote: > > On Oct 15, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > >>> True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used, >>> not >>> the value. >> >> Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can >> understand that it is surprising that they do, but
2008 Oct 15
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 problem? (resend)
...inker will perform this optimization. --- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081015/86ec5f4e/attachment.html>