search for: 86c6626b

...ALUE instructions can already represent addresses or values depending on their second argument. At this point, I don't see any reason to change that. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170907/86c6626b/attachment.html>

I chatted with Chandler in person and came up with what I think is a much simpler design than my previous design in the thread titled "RFC: Introduce DW_OP_LLVM_memory to describe variables in memory with dbg.value". The crux of the problem in that thread is that we need a representation, particularly in the middle-end, to describe a variables address, at a particular program point.