search for: 862.2.3

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:1318 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1318 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: af10287508a7362f9c018b0e6c59ba7bc608260adff8bacbbd9ece097f74742b kernel-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:1318 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1318 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: af10287508a7362f9c018b0e6c59ba7bc608260adff8bacbbd9ece097f74742b kernel-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.x86_64.rpm

Hi all - should I be surprised to be receiving these notifications today when a newer version, 3.10.0-862.3.2, corresponding to https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1629 appears to already be available from CentOS ?yum update? Installing: kernel x86_64 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7 updates 46 M Noam

> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- > plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not > updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain > about mismatched versions though. "kernel-plus-3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.centos.plus" not ".2.3.". Al McCann There's been a circus in my

On 1/8/19 5:30 PM, mark wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I have 4 kernels in /boot, leaving on 20MB which is not enough for the >> next one. >> >> I had installonly_limit= set at 5, as there were some kernel problems. >> After I got the error that there was not enough room for another kernel, >> I set installonly_limit= to 3 and did the update with

I have 4 kernels in /boot, leaving on 20MB which is not enough for the next one. I had installonly_limit= set at 5, as there were some kernel problems.? After I got the error that there was not enough room for another kernel, I set installonly_limit= to 3 and did the update with --exclude=kernel* That worked to update everything else, but not remove the oldest kernel. How can I remove the

Hi Folks, I am having a problem configuring imapsieve via dovecot-pidgeonhole on CentOS7. After following the docs here: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Plugins/IMAPSieve I get: dovecot[22026]: managesieve: Fatal: Plugin 'sieve_imapsieve' not found from directory /usr/lib64/dovecot/sieve dovecot[22026]: doveconf: Error: managesieve-login: dump-capability process returned 89

Trying to limit the API calls to doveadm-http-api by configure allowed commands, but once the commands added to the list, the RestAPI no longer work. 1) Return correct reply when doveadm_allowed_commands is empty # curl -k -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Authorization: X-Dovecot-API <base64 api key>" https://localhost:9088/doveadm/v1

Hello, I have strange problem with "losing" emails after rename mail folder(s) (via imap client: thunderbird, roundcude, etc..) How to reproduce: 1. Create some folder name, like TEST 2. Create sub-folder under TEST (like SUBTEST) Structure: TEST |--SUBTEST # doveadm mailbox list -u postmaster at testmailbox Spam Trash Sent Drafts INBOX TEST TEST/SUBTEST 3. Move (or copy)

Copying or moving with email client: thunderbird, roundcube (webmail), mutt or any other email client via imap protocol. 25.06.2019 22:10, Germ?n Herrera ?????: > Are you copying/moving the emails with {cp|mv} or with "doveadm {copy|move}"? > > On 2019-06-25 12:00, Aleksandr via dovecot wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have strange problem with "losing"

On 05/16/2018 03:10 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > After upgrading my workstation to CentOS 7.5 (1804), I had to upgrade my > kernel from vanilla to kernel-lt from ELRepo. My NVidia GeForce 210 > would only work with the driver provided by NVidia, which in turn > required a more recent kernel than 3.0.10. Anyway. I'm not sure why you need kernel-lt. NVIDIA's proprietary binary

Hi, Can the updated files added to the Centosplus repo be sent to the announcement list please? I can't find them announced in any of the other lists. Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel-plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain about mismatched

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Albert McCann <albert.mccann at outlook.com> wrote: >> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- >> plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not >> updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain >> about mismatched versions though. > >

On 05/25/2018 11:32 AM, Albert McCann wrote: >> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- >> plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not >> updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain >> about mismatched versions though. > >

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have 4 kernels in /boot, leaving on 20MB which is not enough for the > next one. > > I had installonly_limit= set at 5, as there were some kernel problems.? > After I got the error that there was not enough room for another kernel, > I set installonly_limit= to 3 and did the update with --exclude=kernel* > > That worked to update everything else,

On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 17:58, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > On 1/8/19 5:30 PM, mark wrote: > > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> I have 4 kernels in /boot, leaving on 20MB which is not enough for the > >> next one. > >> > >> I had installonly_limit= set at 5, as there were some kernel problems. > >> After I got

On June 7, 2018 6:47:54 PM GMT+02:00, Will Foster <sadsfae at funcamp.net> wrote: >Hi Folks, > >I am having a problem configuring imapsieve via dovecot-pidgeonhole on >CentOS7. > >After following the docs here: > >https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Plugins/IMAPSieve > >I get: > >dovecot[22026]: managesieve: Fatal: Plugin 'sieve_imapsieve'

Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: > can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? Same (wrong) result: 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body 2. Search against "too6Ouka": # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body too6Ouka --> No result 3. Force re-index: # doveadm fts rescan -u username 4. Search again against

Are you copying/moving the emails with {cp|mv} or with "doveadm {copy|move}"? On 2019-06-25 12:00, Aleksandr via dovecot wrote: > Hello, > > I have strange problem with "losing" emails after rename mail > folder(s) (via imap client: thunderbird, roundcude, etc..) > > How to reproduce: > > 1. Create some folder name, like TEST > 2. Create

Hi, After upgrading my workstation to CentOS 7.5 (1804), I had to upgrade my kernel from vanilla to kernel-lt from ELRepo. My NVidia GeForce 210 would only work with the driver provided by NVidia, which in turn required a more recent kernel than 3.0.10. Anyway. Right now here's all the kernels that I have on my workstation: [root at alphamule:~] # rpm -qa | grep -i kernel