Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "860e866e".
2018 Feb 09
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:59 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 23:48 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> > Bringing everything back to this thread -- we now have %V support
> > landed in top-of-tree, so wanted to get confirmation that top-of-tree
> > is healthy for the kernel, or see what else we need to do.
>
> For 64-bit
2018 Feb 09
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...ng long' *either* but Clang seems to cope
with that one.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180209/860e866e/attachment.bin>
2018 Feb 08
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 23:48 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> Bringing everything back to this thread -- we now have %V support
> landed in top-of-tree, so wanted to get confirmation that top-of-tree
> is healthy for the kernel, or see what else we need to do.
For 64-bit it's fine. For 32-bit we *think* the retpoline bits are OK
but it doesn't build for other reasons on 32-bit.