search for: 85ms

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "85ms".

Did you mean: 5ms
2010 Feb 20
23
Rails 3 possible bug in Routing
...te'', :as => :login GET /login works fine: Started GET "/login" for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-02-20 17:45:49 SQL (0.3ms) SET SQL_AUTO_IS_NULL=0 Processing by SessionController#new as HTML Rendered session/new.html.haml within layouts/application.html.haml (77.9ms) Completed in 85ms (Views: 84.1ms | ActiveRecord: 0.2ms) with 200 However POST /login gives the following error: Started POST "/login" for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-02-20 17:45:58 SQL (0.3ms) SET SQL_AUTO_IS_NULL=0 ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches "/login"): rake routes returns th...
2006 Feb 20
9
Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning
...t of these cases, the new jitterbuffer performed a resync during the call. Currently, I have the resyncthreshold, and all other jb parameters at their default levels The traffic is running over a fairly high latency WAN connection between Canada and Atlanta (IAX2, ILBC). Idle ping times run about 85ms. > I am interested to know why you are using ilbc, n why not g729 ot g723 or speex. What is the size of the WAN connection. How many calls are you running over this link. I just need to see how others are fairing with IAX2 over WAN links, as I am the final stages of testing on my side thank...
2006 Jan 13
1
[PATCH] tcp options fix
...* The options on accepted sockets don't inherit from the listen socket, at least on Linux and OS X. * OS X doesn't have SOL_TCP defined, so Nagle was not getting disabled. IPPROTO_TCP should always be the same thing. This patch makes my ping times across a TCP VPN go from ~180 ms to ~85ms. Something still doesn't seem right, though. When I do a ping, I see five packets. I would have expected three (ping, pong + ack if there wasn't one, ack). Why the double send each way? 23:00:44.063609 IP 192.168.1.105.49588 > 216.136.66.56.655: P 689862950:689862956(6) ack 67933...
2006 Feb 17
4
Bridged line appearance
So are there any plans for bridged line appearance support in Asterisk? The new Linksys SPA9000 supports it. A lot of other VoIP systems from Nortel, Sylantro etc. supposedly support it. Seems to me that Asterisk needs to get on the bandwagon or be relegated to call centers, specialized voicemail applications, and phone chat businesses. It's not needed for companies used to PBX's but