search for: 85664

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "85664".

Did you mean: 8564
2023 Dec 16
2
Partial matching performance in data frame rownames using [
...ents. Don't forget to document the new argument in the man page at https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/base/man/Extract.data.frame.Rd Index: src/library/base/R/dataframe.R =================================================================== --- src/library/base/R/dataframe.R (revision 85664) +++ src/library/base/R/dataframe.R (working copy) @@ -591,14 +591,14 @@ ### These are a little less general than S `[.data.frame` <- - function(x, i, j, drop = if(missing(i)) TRUE else length(cols) == 1) + function(x, i, j, drop = if(missing(i)) TRUE else length(cols) == 1, pmatch.ro...
2023 Dec 19
1
Partial matching performance in data frame rownames using [
...ument the new argument in the man page at > https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/base/man/Extract.data.frame.Rd > > Index: src/library/base/R/dataframe.R > =================================================================== > --- src/library/base/R/dataframe.R (revision 85664) > +++ src/library/base/R/dataframe.R (working copy) > @@ -591,14 +591,14 @@ > ### These are a little less general than S > > `[.data.frame` <- > - function(x, i, j, drop = if(missing(i)) TRUE else length(cols) == 1) > + function(x, i, j, drop = if(missing(i))...
2023 Dec 13
1
Partial matching performance in data frame rownames using [
Dear Ivan, thanks a lot, that is helpful. Still, I feel that default partial matching cripples the functionality of data.frame for larger tables. Thanks again and best regards Hilmar On 12.12.23 13:55, Ivan Krylov wrote: > ? Mon, 11 Dec 2023 21:11:48 +0100 > Hilmar Berger via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> ?????: > >> What was unexpected is that in this case was that
2008 Feb 10
1
upgrade perl 5.8.0 -> 5.8.1
Hello List, I have a few intel centos 3.9 boxes with perl-5.8.0-94.EL3 installed. This seems like a very early version of 5.8 perl. centos 4.6 has 5.8.1. Would it be sensible to just upgrade to this rpm? I want a stable platform for cgi. I suppose I could just try it, but these boxes are under a form of change control and I think I should ask for advice before going that route. Many thanks for
2008 Jan 11
0
freebsd-security Digest, Vol 236, Issue 1
...85614 85615 85616 85617 85618 85619 85620 85621 85622 85623 85624 85625 85626 85627 85628 85629 85630 85631 85632 85633 85634 85635 85636 85637 85638 85639 85640 85641 85642 85643 85644 85645 85646 85647 85648 85649 85650 85651 85652 85653 85654 85655 85656 85657 85658 85659 85660 85661 85662 85663 85664 85665 85666 85667 85668 85669 85670 85671 85672 85673 85674 85675 85676 85677 85678 85679 85680 85681 85682 85683 85684 85685 85686 85687 85688 85689 85690 85691 85692 856 93 85694 85695 85696 85697 85698 85699 85700 85701 85702 85703 85704 85705 85706 85707 85708 85709 85710 85711 85712 85713 857...
2008 Jan 10
2
ident daemon: oIdentd creating a lot of processes
...85614 85615 85616 85617 85618 85619 85620 85621 85622 85623 85624 85625 85626 85627 85628 85629 85630 85631 85632 85633 85634 85635 85636 85637 85638 85639 85640 85641 85642 85643 85644 85645 85646 85647 85648 85649 85650 85651 85652 85653 85654 85655 85656 85657 85658 85659 85660 85661 85662 85663 85664 85665 85666 85667 85668 85669 85670 85671 85672 85673 85674 85675 85676 85677 85678 85679 85680 85681 85682 85683 85684 85685 85686 85687 85688 85689 85690 85691 85692 85693 85694 85695 85696 85697 85698 85699 85700 85701 85702 85703 85704 85705 85706 85707 85708 85709 85710 85711 85712 85713 85714...