Displaying 20 results from an estimated 27 matches for "84c7".
Did you mean:
84,7
2014 May 28
1
'restart when convenient'
...;m fairly certain there's no activity on my pbx,
all receivers are OnHook, Asterisk won't restart.
How can i debug why Asterisk thinks it isn't convenient to restart?
Thanks!
-Sander.
--
| Hey.. I'm done talkin'. Now check out my pretty!
| 4096R/20CC6CD2 - 6D40 1A20 B9AA 87D4 84C7 FBD6 F3A9 9442 20CC 6CD2
2012 Jul 19
11
Very slow samba file transfer speed... any ideas ?
Hi,
I have btrfs volume, shared via samba.
I have a directory of documents that I want to backup on my server.
win7 reports a maximum of ~3.10MB/s transfer
transferring the same directory on a ext4 samba share I get 25MB/s +
Any ideas?
Is it like that because of how btrfs works and is setup?
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body
2013 May 11
4
Defragmentation of large files
Hi list,
I have a few large image files (VMware workstation VMDKs and TrueCrypt
containers) which I routinely back up over the network to a btrfs raid10
volume via bigsync (https://code.google.com/p/bigsync/).
The VM images in particular get really fragmented due to CoW, which is
expected. I haven''t yet switched off CoW on the backups directory mainly
to experiment and see what
2012 Oct 27
7
How does btrfs behave on checksum mismatch?
I came across the tidbit that ZFS has a contract guarantee that the
data read back will either be correct (the checksum computed over the
data read from the disk matches the checksum stored on disk), or you
get an I/O error. Obviously, this greatly reduces the probability that
the data is invalid. (Particularly when taken in combination with the
disk firmware''s own ECC and checksumming.)
2013 Jan 31
3
/home on BTRFS on SSD, now highly fragmenting virtuoso database - use autodefrag?
...ich tends to use lots of (smaller) files and due to KDE PIM from
KDE SC 4.4.11 still in Debian, there is no mail metadata in it, just contacts and
calendar metadata.
Ciao,
--
Martin ''Helios'' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2006 Jul 14
0
Write barrier support in ext3
...nue grepping kernel changelogs and the
internet for until I have the information I want for that article.
Please CC to me personally as I am not subscribed to the list...
Regards,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
2011 May 14
0
data alignment for SSD: Stripe size or sector size given with -s?
...the flash.
(Re: SSDs and filesystem alignment... from 2009-02-23,
Message-Id: <1235398980.11205.5.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>)
But what about data alignment?
Ciao,
--
Martin ''Helios'' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
2011 Jun 23
0
Using compression on SSD
...ns?
[1] http://www.techenclave.com/open-source-and-linux/ssds-and-btrfs-match-
made-heaven-183940.html
[2] http://www.anandtech.com/show/4244/intel-ssd-320-review
Ciao,
--
Martin ''Helios'' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2012 Jan 28
0
Re: [PATCH 3/3] filemap: don't call generic_write_sync for -EIOCBQUEUED
...->i_mutex);
>
> - if (ret > 0 || ret == -EIOCBQUEUED) {
> + if (ret > 0) {
> ssize_t err;
>
> err = generic_write_sync(file, pos, ret);
--
Martin ''Helios'' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
2014 May 28
1
Asterisk crashes suddenly
Hello friends,
I have been experienced suddenly stops for my Asterisk server, I do not why
is it happening. Asterisk's debug messages only tell me I have lacked g729
codec for translation to one peer minutes before the crashes occur
[2014-05-27 09:48:30] WARNING[15384][C-0000017c] channel.c: Unable to find
a codec translation path from (ulaw) to (g729)
[2014-05-27 09:48:30]
2012 Aug 03
2
no space left on device
Hi,
I am new to btrfs, and just installed a new system with SLED 11 SP2 a
few days ago.
However the system seems to be in a real sad state now, saying there
is no free space left on the device even though there is about 8GB
left on the / filesystem.
A defragment works sometimes but then it goes back to the original
state a day or two later. Other times the command just won''t respond.
2012 Oct 07
29
BTRFS, getting darn slower everyday
Hi,
I have 4 machines, all converted to BTRFS about 6 months ago, now all
running Ubuntu Quantal with kernel 3.5.0-17
The matter is that all these machines are now getting slower and slower
everyday, every disk access causing the disk to be 100% busy for long
periods, to the point that I''m now seriously considering migrating
everything back to ext4...
From the start BTRFS was "not
2011 Feb 03
3
Re: [Bug #27842] [regression?] hang with 2.6.37 on a BTRFS test machine
...ng:
flush-btrfs-1 hangs when building openwrt
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=129594547616298&w=2
I will add this as comment to the bug report as well.
Thanks,
--
Martin ''Helios'' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
2011 Dec 07
7
FS won't mount, open_ctree failed, Assertion !(path->slots[0] == 0) failed
So I''m having a bit of trouble with one of my btrfs filesystems. It isn''t mounting after a power failure. I can''t get restore or btrfsck to run, even on backup supers. I''ve pasted some output below. My btrfs-progs below come from git this morning, running on linux 3.2.0.
# mount /dev/md2 /media/test/
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on
2013 May 04
4
Scrub CPU usage ...
I just subscribed to this list so in case this subject has already been
discussed at length, my apologies. I have been waiting for btrfs
forever. I have been waiting for it to become reasonably stable. In
the wake of escalating problems with my old hardware RAID setup, I
decided now was the time to make the transition. At this point I have
been completely transitioned to btrfs for nearly
2012 May 17
6
SSD format/mount parameters questions
For using SSDs:
Are there any format/mount parameters that should be set for using btrfs
on SSDs (other than the "ssd" mount option)?
General questions:
How long is the ''delay'' for the delayed alloc?
Are file allocations aligned to 4kiB boundaries, or larger?
What byte value is used to pad unused space?
(Aside: For some, the erased state reads all 0x00, and for
2011 Dec 28
13
fstrim on BTRFS
...aba:~> fstrim -v /
/: 4341846016 bytes were trimmed
Is it planned to add this feature to BTRFS as well?
I wish you a relaxed between Christmas and new year time,
--
Martin ''Helios'' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2012 Apr 17
3
Btrfs in degraded mode
Hello,
I have created a btrfs filesystem with RAID1 setup having 2 disks. Everything
works fine but when I try to umount the device and remount it in degraded mode,
the data still goes into both the disk. ideally in degraded mode only one disk
show disk activity and not the failed ones.
System Config:
Base OS: Slackware
kernel: linux 3.3.2
"sar -pd 2 10" shows me that the data is
2012 Oct 25
46
[RFC] New attempt to a better "btrfs fi df"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
this is a new attempt to improve the output of the command "btrfs fi df".
The previous attempt received a good reception. However there was no a
general consensus about the wording.
Moreover I still didn''t understand how btrfs was using the disks.
A my first attempt was to develop a new command which shows how the
disks
2010 Aug 02
10
Number of hard links limit
Hi,
There''s been discussion before on this list on the very small number
of hard links supported by btrfs.[1][2] In those threads, an often
asked question has been if there''s a real world use case the limit
breaks. Also it has been pointed out that a fix for this would need a
disk format change.
As discussed in bug #15762 [3], there are certainly real-world use
cases this