Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "847e".
Did you mean:
847
2012 Oct 13
1
low samba performance with glusterfs backend
...MB/s.
However, cifs over glusterfs aggregate throughput only can get about 180 MB/s.
Why CIFS performance is so slow over glusterfs backend?
Anybody meet such issues and how to resolve(samba and glusterfs parameters)?
thanks a lot in advance.
#test local ext4
[root at pana53 5f4554cf-3b56-43e5-847e-cb409b0edc30]# dd if=/dev/zero of=dd.dat bs=1MB count=10k
10240+0 records in
10240+0 records out
10240000000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 21.4764 s, 477 MB/s
#test local glusterfs
[root at pana53 61659a17-69bd-4704-81fe-0853f1c891cd]# dd if=/dev/zero of=dd.dat bs=1MB count=10k
10240+0 records in
1...
2012 Oct 13
1
low samba performance with glusterfs backend
...MB/s.
However, cifs over glusterfs aggregate throughput only can get about 180 MB/s.
Why CIFS performance is so slow over glusterfs backend?
Anybody meet such issues and how to resolve(samba and glusterfs parameters)?
thanks a lot in advance.
#test local ext4
[root at pana53 5f4554cf-3b56-43e5-847e-cb409b0edc30]# dd if=/dev/zero of=dd.dat bs=1MB count=10k
10240+0 records in
10240+0 records out
10240000000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 21.4764 s, 477 MB/s
#test local glusterfs
[root at pana53 61659a17-69bd-4704-81fe-0853f1c891cd]# dd if=/dev/zero of=dd.dat bs=1MB count=10k
10240+0 records in
1...