search for: 847ac366

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "847ac366".

2008 May 17
0
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
...deduce that tmp2 can really take > its value from function call? No, because the callee and caller may be in different translation units. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080516/847ac366/attachment.html>
2008 May 16
2
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
To me, this "optimization" problem doesn't seem to be a consequence of doing the promotion differently than what is currently being done in llvm. Anyways, I don't agree that the information is completely lost. Shouldn't an llvm pass be able to figure out if the truncated value is coming from a function call, and since it is aware of calling convention, it should be able to