Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "844417cc".
2015 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal to Remove Poison
...t having to prove that %a is not
INT_MAX. I'm pretty sure instcombine does something like this today, and
this change would provide the basis for it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150208/844417cc/attachment.html>
2015 Feb 08
11
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal to Remove Poison
Hello,
I'd like to offer an alternative solution to the "poison problem": remove
it.
What follows is rather informal. I'd happily write up a nicer document if
this RFC stands up to scrutiny.
The idea was born from two observations:
- undef was introduced to model a load of uninitialized memory, a form of
undefined behavior.
- poison was introduced to model integer overflow,