Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "8428a019".
2018 Aug 21
3
Condition code in DAGCombiner::visitFADDForFMACombine?
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 17:57, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Matt,
> I'm sorry, actually it's fma not fmad.
>
> In the post-legalizer DAG combine for the given code it's producing fma not fmad. That doens't seem correct.
>
The contract is on the fadd. I’m not really sure what the rule is supposed to be for contract between the nodes.