search for: 83m

I''m running OpenSolaris 2008.05 in VirtualBox on a Windows XP host. Playing around with various probes, I found that trying to load any probe associated with bdev_strategy dumps core. I can think of one or two likely and reasonable causes for this, but am assuming it''s undesirable behavior. Anyone know what''s happening here? -- This message posted from

...verify-uselistorder 121M llvm-cat 120M llvm-as 117M llvm-special-case-list-fuzzer 117M llvm-demangle-fuzzer 116M llvm-modextract 114M obj2yaml 112M llvm-xray 105M sanstats 105M llvm-symbolizer 96M llvm-readobj 93M llvm-cov 90M lli-child-target 86M llvm-cxxdump 85M llvm-objcopy 83M llvm-cvtres 82M llvm-size 76M clang-apply-replacements 75M clang-format 64M llvm-diff 59M llvm-dis 53M llvm-stress 50M llvm-tblgen 48M llvm-profdata 31M yaml2obj 17M clang-tblgen - regards, Manuel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:...

...data@ 0 /dev/hdd: pdc, "pdc_bacfgfjaf", mirror, ok, 117231345 sectors, data@ 0 But then using df it is less obvious: df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 54G 1009M 50G 2% / /dev/mapper/pdc_bacfgfjafp1 99M 11M 83M 12% /boot tmpfs 125M 0 125M 0% /dev/shm pvs shows VolGroup00 as using pdc_bacfgfjafp2: PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/mapper/pdc_bacfgfjafp2 VolGroup00 lvm2 a- 55.78G 32.00M which is RAID1?????? Seems to be: dmraid -s *** Active S...

...-special-case-list-fuzzer > 117M llvm-demangle-fuzzer > 116M llvm-modextract > 114M obj2yaml > 112M llvm-xray > 105M sanstats > 105M llvm-symbolizer > 96M llvm-readobj > 93M llvm-cov > 90M lli-child-target > 86M llvm-cxxdump > 85M llvm-objcopy > 83M llvm-cvtres > 82M llvm-size > 76M clang-apply-replacements > 75M clang-format > 64M llvm-diff > 59M llvm-dis > 53M llvm-stress > 50M llvm-tblgen > 48M llvm-profdata > 31M yaml2obj > 17M clang-tblgen > > > - regards, > > Manuel > &g...

....h:1110: error: expected `,' or `;'Total user time : 3.188 sec.Total system time: 0.472 sec.Simulation user time : 2.892 sec.Simulation system time: 0.400 sec.Caching user time : 0.296 sec.Caching system time: 0.072 sec.Simulation speed : 2.285e+07 inst/sec.Total instructions : 83634854 (83M)Requested blocks : 1.Cache-hit count : 0.Connected servers/threads : 2 of 2.Compilation count : thread 0: 0 thread 1: 0Please also advise on whether LLVM-GCC is able to do any aid to Instruction SetSimulation. Thanks in advance.RegardsWang Hao Lee ________________________________________________...

...Mounted on /dev/sda2 145M 116M 21M 85% / /dev/sda1 168M 7.0M 152M 5% /boot /dev/sda9 8.2G 3.9G 3.9G 50% /home /dev/sda8 2.0G 341M 1.5G 19% /home/root none 506M 0 506M 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda7 92M 4.1M 83M 5% /tmp /dev/sda5 4.2G 1.5G 2.5G 37% /usr /dev/sda3 981M 743M 189M 80% /var /dev/shm 53M 0 53M 0% /var/amavis/tmp What to do? Thanks, Scott

Hi list! Now when Fedora 10 is out, I thought of writing here what's needed to run Fedora 10 Xen domUs on CentOS 5 dom0. Fedora 10 does not have separate kernel-xen, but instead Xen domU support is included in the normal kernel-PAE.i686 and kernel.x86_64 (based on the pv_ops Xen support included in the mainline/vanilla Linux kernels). RHEL 5.3 beta (and final obviously too) includes

...=EF=9D=8F=B3=E0d=FBl=BFj=C4=D7/=FD=9C=B00=8D=C9Z=C9=CC\=A9XP 3=F1*=DD=D8=B0. k0=87=92h=E1=F8=9Cp=C7nc=BCl=C8=B7=AB=94=D5=F3=CAO=DC^=F31=F8=8AQ'!\B-=85= =A7-=8B=EE=92=CC=E5=EB=82=B6=E4=8A=DC'=EE.=B4=81=E9rP=9A=86Q=9En=AF&=81=A5= >m=DA=AE=F7=8E=A6=CC2=93=F1=EE=F4x2-5=8DMT=9AR=F94=C3=D5=83m=EC=F2=8FH=8C= =8F'=98]=BE=B6f=85=D3B=A1g=DB=EA=9B=8E "=AE=85=D5=89*=E2f=8Akgd?=F9#=83=C1=C3u=AA=B3e=FA=E0=FCB=C8R=94=96!=DE/a?= ub=EE=A4=D0S=86g=BAR=E7=DC=A0=FA=B2=DF=FD=F0=E5V=92=CE=CB=F7=FA=FA=D1=9F=B0= =C5~=98ol=A3\da=C7=D3]=A3b=D0Y(=E8A=F6=B7=E6kl`=C0=FAPg=CE=B8=DA=FC=F2=84= 9=EAe=84D=...