Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "83c3e984".
2014 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] on type annotations of LLVM IR
...es,
> without having to chase through a load of other parts of the code to find
> where things were declared.
>
> David
>
>
--
Rekha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141027/83c3e984/attachment.html>
2014 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] on type annotations of LLVM IR
Hi,
I am curious to know the design decision on why operands of LLVM IR
instructions are type annotated.
Why wasn't the C style of explicit declaration of variables (or values in
LLVM context) followed by their uses model not adopted here?
or may be even annotate the value (result of the Instruction) with type
rather than annotating each operands on the Instruction?
Just felt that by