Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "83b0b1f2".
2011 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] appropriate for run-time compilation of DSL?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:50 AM, edA-qa mort-ora-y <eda-qa at disemia.com> wrote:
> I wish to know whether LLVM is an appropriate choice for a project I'm
> working on (excuse me if this is the wrong list for this question).
>
> I have a domain-specific-language (DSL) that is currently compiled to a
> custom byte-code and run in a VM. This is written in C++. The DSL can
2011 Apr 12
2
[LLVMdev] appropriate for run-time compilation of DSL?
...pt: I'm also happy to receive encrypted mail.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110412/83b0b1f2/attachment.sig>
2011 Apr 11
2
[LLVMdev] appropriate for run-time compilation of DSL?
I wish to know whether LLVM is an appropriate choice for a project I'm
working on (excuse me if this is the wrong list for this question).
I have a domain-specific-language (DSL) that is currently compiled to a
custom byte-code and run in a VM. This is written in C++. The DSL can
call high-level functions which are actually callbacks into the current
non-DSL environment. That is, these