search for: 83b0b1f2

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "83b0b1f2".

2011 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] appropriate for run-time compilation of DSL?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:50 AM, edA-qa mort-ora-y <eda-qa at disemia.com> wrote: > I wish to know whether LLVM is an appropriate choice for a project I'm > working on (excuse me if this is the wrong list for this question). > > I have a domain-specific-language (DSL) that is currently compiled to a > custom byte-code and run in a VM. This is written in C++. The DSL can
2011 Apr 12
2
[LLVMdev] appropriate for run-time compilation of DSL?
...pt: I'm also happy to receive encrypted mail. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110412/83b0b1f2/attachment.sig>
2011 Apr 11
2
[LLVMdev] appropriate for run-time compilation of DSL?
I wish to know whether LLVM is an appropriate choice for a project I'm working on (excuse me if this is the wrong list for this question). I have a domain-specific-language (DSL) that is currently compiled to a custom byte-code and run in a VM. This is written in C++. The DSL can call high-level functions which are actually callbacks into the current non-DSL environment. That is, these