Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "8390117b".
Did you mean:
830617b
2010 Feb 08
0
[LLVMdev] How to check for "SPARC code generation" in MachineBasicBlock.cpp?
On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote:
> Firstly, the BNE/BA pair should be reduced to a BE (I assume this is
> the responsibility of AnalyzeBranch and friends that you mention).
Right. Implementing AnalyzeBranch will allow a bunch of block layout
and branch optimizations to happen.
> However I still wouldn't have expected that to result in the label
> being
2010 Feb 09
3
[LLVMdev] How to check for "SPARC code generation" in MachineBasicBlock.cpp?
...at are blocking the bootstrap.
Cheers,
Nathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: llvm-sparc-asmprinter1.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6878 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100210/8390117b/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: llvm-sparc-asmprinter2.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1250 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100210/8390117b/attachment-0001.obj...
2010 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] How to check for "SPARC code generation" in MachineBasicBlock.cpp?
On 11/12/2009, at 10:43 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Hi, Chris
>
>> That is target independent code, so you should not put sparc specific changes there. It sounds like one of the sparc-specific target hooks is wrong.
> Since sparc does not provide any hooks for operation of branches (e.g.
> AnalyzeBranch and friends) it might be possible that generic codegen
> code is