search for: 838g

...ys backward. All snapshots easily available via NFS mount. And NAS capacity is cheaper. > Miloslav> Last half year, we encoutered into performace > Miloslav> troubles. Server load grows up to 30 in rush hours, due to > Miloslav> IO waits. We tried to attach next harddrives (the 838G ones > Miloslav> in a list below) and increase a free space by rebalace. I > Miloslav> think, it helped a little bit, not not so rapidly. > > If you're IOPs bound, but not space bound, then you *really* want to > get an SSD in there for the indexes and such. Basically the...

...e brtfs send to ship off snapshots instead of using rsync? I'm sure that would be an improvement... Miloslav> Last half year, we encoutered into performace Miloslav> troubles. Server load grows up to 30 in rush hours, due to Miloslav> IO waits. We tried to attach next harddrives (the 838G ones Miloslav> in a list below) and increase a free space by rebalace. I Miloslav> think, it helped a little bit, not not so rapidly. If you're IOPs bound, but not space bound, then you *really* want to get an SSD in there for the indexes and such. Basically the stuff that gets written/...

...ormat, LMTP delivery. We run 'rsync' to remote NAS daily. It takes about 6.5 hours to finish, 12'265'387 files last night. Last half year, we encoutered into performace troubles. Server load grows up to 30 in rush hours, due to IO waits. We tried to attach next harddrives (the 838G ones in a list below) and increase a free space by rebalace. I think, it helped a little bit, not not so rapidly. Is this a reasonable setup and use case for btrfs RAID-10? If so, are there some recommendations to achieve better performance? Thank you. With kind regards Milo # megaclisas-sta...

...ory: 1.5GB Disks: 3 x 300GB Seagate SATA II drives (with ~25GB carved out of each for the Host OS) -- The commands I ran: [b]bash-3.00# zpool create sata raidz c2t0d0 c2t1d0 c2t2d0 bash-3.00# zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT sata 838G 108K 838G 0% ONLINE - bash-3.00# zpool status pool: sata state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM sata ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0...

...ys backward. All snapshots easily available via NFS mount. And NAS capacity is cheaper. > Miloslav> Last half year, we encoutered into performace > Miloslav> troubles. Server load grows up to 30 in rush hours, due to > Miloslav> IO waits. We tried to attach next harddrives (the 838G ones > Miloslav> in a list below) and increase a free space by rebalace. I > Miloslav> think, it helped a little bit, not not so rapidly. > > If you're IOPs bound, but not space bound, then you *really* want to > get an SSD in there for the indexes and such.??Basically the...

...FSv3 volume(s) on the Netapp(s). Should do wonders. And you'll stop needing to do rsync at night. Miloslav> Last half year, we encoutered into performace Miloslav> troubles. Server load grows up to 30 in rush hours, due to Miloslav> IO waits. We tried to attach next harddrives (the 838G ones Miloslav> in a list below) and increase a free space by rebalace. I Miloslav> think, it helped a little bit, not not so rapidly. >> If you're IOPs bound, but not space bound, then you *really* want to >> get an SSD in there for the indexes and such. Basically the stuff...

...is, that IMAP server is completely isolated from network. But maybe one day will use it. > Miloslav> Last half year, we encoutered into performace > Miloslav> troubles. Server load grows up to 30 in rush hours, due to > Miloslav> IO waits. We tried to attach next harddrives (the 838G ones > Miloslav> in a list below) and increase a free space by rebalace. I > Miloslav> think, it helped a little bit, not not so rapidly. > >>> If you're IOPs bound, but not space bound, then you *really* want to >>> get an SSD in there for the indexes and such...