Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "8388607".
Did you mean:
8388608
2012 Jan 16
1
CentOS 6 (G)parted re-aligning existing partitions?
I used Hiren Boot CD (Some tool on it) to create 8 partitions for
Windows XP and CentOS 6.
Now, CentOS6 Disk Utility reports for first partition:
"Warning: The partition is misaligned by 512 bytes. This may result in
very poor performances. Repartitioning is suggested.",
and similar warnings almost all other partitions.
Since I already have both Windows (NTFS) and CentOS 6
2014 Aug 25
0
WebRTC / Rejecting secure audio stream errors
...ate:1 2 UDP 2113667326 192.168.1.161 33161 typ host
-a=candidate:2 2 UDP 2113667326 195.8.117.161 36491 typ host
+a=setup:actpass
+a=candidate:0 1 UDP 2122252543 10.10.1.90 60221 typ host
+a=candidate:1 1 UDP 1686110207 195.8.117.200 60221 typ srflx raddr
10.10.1.90 rport 60221
+a=candidate:2 1 UDP 8388607 195.8.117.59 51390 typ relay raddr
195.8.117.59 rport 51390
+a=candidate:3 1 UDP 2122187007 192.168.150.1 38505 typ host
+a=candidate:0 2 UDP 2122252542 10.10.1.90 55368 typ host
+a=candidate:1 2 UDP 1686110206 195.8.117.200 55368 typ srflx raddr
10.10.1.90 rport 55368
+a=candidate:2 2 UDP 8388606...
2013 Feb 09
2
Commonly getting FLAC__STREAM_ENCODER_VERIFY_MISMATCH_IN_AUDIO_DATA on valid audio
...d.html#SFC_SET_NORM_DOUBLE
Thanks, I don't think I saw that page before, for some strange reason.
The sentence ?setting normalisation to SF_FALSE means that no scaling
will take place?, does this mean, for instance for a 24-bit file, that
the values will be doubles in the interval -8388608 to +8388607?
That information should probably be added to question 10 in your FAQ, I suppose.
For my purpose, not ?normalising? at all seems to be a good enough
idea, I think. I will calculate the levels from dB anyway, so I just
need to know how many bits per sample there is, which libsndfile
easily lets me...
2013 Feb 09
5
Commonly getting FLAC__STREAM_ENCODER_VERIFY_MISMATCH_IN_AUDIO_DATA on valid audio
2013/2/8 Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com>:
> Collin wrote:
>
>> It turns out it was an error on my part; sorry for the trouble. I misunderstood
>> the format libflac was expecting my samples in. I found the wording in the
>> documentation very confusing.
>>
>> My audio file has 2 channels and 16-bit samples, so I have to pull out each
>>
2017 Jun 19
4
LLVM behavior different depending on function symbol name
Greetings,
I have a Zig implementation of ceil which is emitted into LLVM IR like this:
; Function Attrs: nobuiltin nounwind
define internal fastcc float @ceil(float) unnamed_addr #3 !dbg !644 {
Entry:
%x = alloca float, align 4
store float %0, float* %x
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata float* %x, metadata !649, metadata
!494), !dbg !651
%1 = load float, float* %x, !dbg !652
%2 =
2017 Jun 19
2
LLVM behavior different depending on function symbol name
...; preds = %Entry
%10 = load i32, i32* %e, !dbg !88
%11 = icmp sge i32 %10, 0, !dbg !89
br i1 %11, label %Then1, label %Else2, !dbg !89
Then1: ; preds = %Else
%12 = load i32, i32* %e, !dbg !90
%13 = lshr i32 8388607, %12, !dbg !92
store i32 %13, i32* %m, !dbg !93
%14 = load i32, i32* %u, !dbg !94
%15 = load i32, i32* %m, !dbg !95
%16 = and i32 %14, %15, !dbg !96
%17 = icmp eq i32 %16, 0, !dbg !97
br i1 %17, label %Then3, label %Else4, !dbg !97
Else2: ; pr...
2017 Jun 19
2
LLVM behavior different depending on function symbol name
...t; %10 = load i32, i32* %e, !dbg !88
>> %11 = icmp sge i32 %10, 0, !dbg !89
>> br i1 %11, label %Then1, label %Else2, !dbg !89
>>
>> Then1: ; preds = %Else
>> %12 = load i32, i32* %e, !dbg !90
>> %13 = lshr i32 8388607, %12, !dbg !92
>> store i32 %13, i32* %m, !dbg !93
>> %14 = load i32, i32* %u, !dbg !94
>> %15 = load i32, i32* %m, !dbg !95
>> %16 = and i32 %14, %15, !dbg !96
>> %17 = icmp eq i32 %16, 0, !dbg !97
>> br i1 %17, label %Then3, label %Else4, !dbg !97
&...