search for: 835k

...415G 29.0G 30 28 460K 278K c6t3d4 - - 11 19 804K 268K c4t1d2 - - 15 22 987K 278K mirror 255G 441G 26 49 536K 1.02M c8t22110001552F3C46d0 - - 12 27 835K 1.02M c8t224B0001559BB471d0 - - 12 29 835K 1.02M mirror 257G 439G 32 52 571K 1.04M c8t22480001552D7AF8d0 - - 14 28 1003K 1.04M c4t1d0 - - 14 32 1002K 1.04M mirror...

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:01 AM, David Piepgrass <dpiepgrass at mentoreng.com> wrote: >> A LLVM JIT compiler for x86 under 1 MB? I doubt it is possible without >> a major rewriting of LLVM. > > Even with no optimizations? Drat. That means I can't use it. Why? I'd never checked, but I always assumed the LLVM JIT was much larger than 3.4 MB. For comparison: [rnk at

...5.43%, 20=0.40%, 50=0.04% lat (msec): 100=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%, 2000=0.01% randrw: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=2568 read : io=6,127MB, bw=62,184KB/s, iops=15,545, runt=100892msec slat (usec): min=12, max=24,702, avg=184.77, stdev=262.08 clat (usec): min=3, max=835K, avg=2243.55, stdev=1722.47 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=99480, per=0.48%, avg=4246.35, stdev=16608.96 write: io=2,041MB, bw=20,717KB/s, iops=5,179, runt=100892msec slat (usec): min=12, max=24,701, avg=186.54, stdev=267.69 clat (usec): min=8, max=50,242, avg=2235.46, stdev=1442.06 b...

...5.43%, 20=0.40%, 50=0.04% lat (msec): 100=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%, 2000=0.01% randrw: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=2568 read : io=6,127MB, bw=62,184KB/s, iops=15,545, runt=100892msec slat (usec): min=12, max=24,702, avg=184.77, stdev=262.08 clat (usec): min=3, max=835K, avg=2243.55, stdev=1722.47 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=99480, per=0.48%, avg=4246.35, stdev=16608.96 write: io=2,041MB, bw=20,717KB/s, iops=5,179, runt=100892msec slat (usec): min=12, max=24,701, avg=186.54, stdev=267.69 clat (usec): min=8, max=50,242, avg=2235.46, stdev=1442.06 b...