search for: 82575eb

...pdated "igb" driver into the CentOS 5.2 installation for a HP DL165G5p(I'm not ready yet for CentOS 5.3). Anyways, I had a pretty basic question, I added a bunch of entries into the pci.ids file that were not there previously that came with the newer driver, including: 10a7 82575EB Gigabit Network Connection 10a9 82575EB Gigabit Backplane Connection 10c9 82576 Gigabit Network Connection 10d6 82575GB Gigabit Network Connection 10e6 82576 Gigabit Network Connection 10e7 82576 Gigabit Network Connection 10e8 82576 Gigabit Net...

...equire a hard boot to resolve. All have Intel NICs. Often the systems will remain stable for days or weeks, then suddenly encounter one of these issues. I have yet to tie the error to any specific action on the systems and can't reproduce it reliably. - Supermicro X8DT3, Dual Xeon E5620, 2x 82575EB NICs, 2x 82576 NICs Kernel messages upon failure: pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Transaction Layer, id=0018(Receiver ID) pcieport 0000:00:03.0: device [8086:340a] error status/mask=00002000/0...

...ng: Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tained 2.6.32.18-xen #4 warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50 the ooops image is in the attachment of this post. I''ve checked the mailing list, some one said it''s about the e1000e driver with a wrong config of the EEPROM. So I switch to use the network card 82575EB with igb driver It seems to work well, until I find it can''t receive any packets in DomU. And I see a lot of packets dropped when I ifconfig these interfaces. Anyone knows how to deal with this ? -- hepeng ICT _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen...

...ng: Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tained 2.6.32.18-xen #4 warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50 the ooops image is in the attachment of this post. I''ve checked the mailing list, some one said it''s about the e1000e driver with a wrong config of the EEPROM. So I switch to use the network card 82575EB with igb driver It seems to work well, until I find it can''t receive any packets in DomU. And I see a lot of packets dropped when I ifconfig these interfaces. Anyone knows how to deal with this ? -- hepeng ICT _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen...

...> Thanks to everyone that provided tips and suggestions along the way. > Do you mind sharing what hardware have you been running the 4.9 kernel on other than "Supermicro X9DRT, Dual Xeon E5-2650, 2x I350, 2x 82571EB" and "Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF, Dual Xeon E5-2630, 2x I350, 2x 82575EB" if any? Are you using any SATA/SAS controllers? Thanks, Sarah

...equire a hard boot to resolve. All have Intel NICs. Often the systems will remain stable for days or weeks, then suddenly encounter one of these issues. I have yet to tie the error to any specific action on the systems and can't reproduce it reliably. - Supermicro X8DT3, Dual Xeon E5620, 2x 82575EB NICs, 2x 82576 NICs Kernel messages upon failure: pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Transaction Layer, id=0018(Receiver ID) pcieport 0000:00:03.0: device [8086:340a] error status/mask=00002000/0...

...All have Intel NICs. > > Often the systems will remain stable for days or weeks, then suddenly > encounter one of these issues. I have yet to tie the error to any > specific action on the systems and can't reproduce it reliably. > > - Supermicro X8DT3, Dual Xeon E5620, 2x 82575EB NICs, 2x 82576 NICs > > Kernel messages upon failure: > > pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 > pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, > type=Transaction Layer, id=0018(Receiver ID) > pcieport 0000:00:03.0: device [8086...

...ided tips and suggestions along the way. >>> >> >> Do you mind sharing what hardware have you been running the 4.9 kernel on other than "Supermicro X9DRT, Dual Xeon E5-2650, 2x I350, 2x 82571EB" and >> "Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF, Dual Xeon E5-2630, 2x I350, 2x 82575EB" if any? Are you using any SATA/SAS controllers? > > We have no expansion cards installed except for the dual-port gigabit > NICs. We're using the onboard SATA controller for only the local Dom0 > OS, and iSCSI and NFS for managing storage for VMs and images. > We've...

...interface on the expansion NIC with the > jumbo MTU failed. > > The other NIC in the LACP bundle is onboard and didn't fail. The other > NIC on the dual-port expansion card also didn't fail. This leads me to > believe that ONE of the bugs I'm experiencing is related to 82575EB + > jumbo frames. > > I still think I'm also having a PCI-e issue that is separate and > additional on top of that, and which has not reared its head recently, > making it difficult for me to gather any new data. > > One of the things I've done that seemed to help a l...

...9;s still quite a few days out looks like. I''ve seen newer Xen packages built for RHEL/CentOS and discussed on here, is what comes stock stable enough or are newer versions primarily to add more features? Grasping at straws.... Thanks. PS. 08:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82575EB Gigabit Network Connection (rev 02) _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

On 01/30/2017 06:12 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote: > On 31/01/17 10:49, Kevin Stange wrote: >> You said 3.x kernels specifically. The kernel on Xen Made Easy now is a >> 4.4 kernel. Any chance you have tested with that one? > > Not yet, however the future Xen nodes we'll deploy will run CentOS 7 and > Xen with kernel 4.4. I'll keep you (and others here) posted on my

...ttp://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1649 2. xm vcpu-set can''t work to guest http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1650 3. [SR-IOV]Guest cann''t get ip with vf assigned http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1651 4. Guest with Intel 82575EB NIC assigned can''t boot up on stoakley http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1652 5. save/restore cannot work http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1653 6. cpu online/offine will cause system hang http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1654...

...>> >> Often the systems will remain stable for days or weeks, then suddenly >> encounter one of these issues. I have yet to tie the error to any >> specific action on the systems and can't reproduce it reliably. >> >> - Supermicro X8DT3, Dual Xeon E5620, 2x 82575EB NICs, 2x 82576 NICs >> >> Kernel messages upon failure: >> >> pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 >> pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, >> type=Transaction Layer, id=0018(Receiver ID) >> pcieport 00...

Hello All, this is my first post so I'll try to be as verbose as possible. We have a PXE deployment server serving mostly fujitsu RX300 rack mount servers with Intel 82575EB Gigabit Ethernet Controllers onboard. I recently upgraded from version 4.07 to version 6.02 and, without making any edits to my default menu, immediately noticed a regression. I use vesamenu.c32 to present a menu to the user which starts with something like this: default vesamenu.c32 prompt 0...

...All have Intel NICs. > > Often the systems will remain stable for days or weeks, then suddenly > encounter one of these issues. I have yet to tie the error to any specific > action on the systems and can't reproduce it reliably. > > - Supermicro X8DT3, Dual Xeon E5620, 2x 82575EB NICs, 2x 82576 NICs > > Kernel messages upon failure: > > pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 > pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Transaction > Layer, id=0018(Receiver ID) > pcieport 0000:00:03.0: device [8086...

...ryone that provided tips and suggestions along the way. >> > > Do you mind sharing what hardware have you been running the 4.9 kernel on other than "Supermicro X9DRT, Dual Xeon E5-2650, 2x I350, 2x 82571EB" and > "Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF, Dual Xeon E5-2630, 2x I350, 2x 82575EB" if any? Are you using any SATA/SAS controllers? We have no expansion cards installed except for the dual-port gigabit NICs. We're using the onboard SATA controller for only the local Dom0 OS, and iSCSI and NFS for managing storage for VMs and images. -- Kevin Stange Chief Technology O...

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Cory Fair <cory.fair at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, this is my first post so I'll try to be as verbose as possible. > > We have a PXE deployment server serving mostly fujitsu RX300 rack mount > servers with Intel 82575EB Gigabit Ethernet Controllers onboard. I recently > upgraded from version 4.07 to version 6.02 and, without making any edits to > my default menu, immediately noticed a regression. I use vesamenu.c32 to > present a menu to the user which starts with something like this: > > default ve...

...and within 12 hours, the interface on the expansion NIC with the jumbo MTU failed. The other NIC in the LACP bundle is onboard and didn't fail. The other NIC on the dual-port expansion card also didn't fail. This leads me to believe that ONE of the bugs I'm experiencing is related to 82575EB + jumbo frames. I still think I'm also having a PCI-e issue that is separate and additional on top of that, and which has not reared its head recently, making it difficult for me to gather any new data. One of the things I've done that seemed to help a lot with stability was balance the L...

...pansion NIC with the >> jumbo MTU failed. >> >> The other NIC in the LACP bundle is onboard and didn't fail. The other >> NIC on the dual-port expansion card also didn't fail. This leads me to >> believe that ONE of the bugs I'm experiencing is related to 82575EB + >> jumbo frames. >> >> I still think I'm also having a PCI-e issue that is separate and >> additional on top of that, and which has not reared its head recently, >> making it difficult for me to gather any new data. >> >> One of the things I've do...

...2801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI > Controller #5 > +-1a.2 Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI > Controller #6 > +-1a.7 Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB2 EHCI > Controller #2 > +-1c.0-[0000:1f]--+-00.0 Intel Corporation 82575EB Gigabit > Network Connection > | \-00.1 Intel Corporation 82575EB Gigabit > Network Connection > +-1d.0 Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI > Controller #1 > +-1d.1 Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UH...