Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "8204k".
Did you mean:
8204
2014 Jul 09
0
Possible memdisk issue
...floppyimg always tells me H=64 S=32 and then C is the
> approximately the number of MB. And MEMDISK auto-determines those exact
> same numbers. But if I manually call mkdosfs there's a lot more output,
> most of it ignored by newmkfloppyimg. In particular, the output for
> 8203K and 8204K is different:
>
> mkdosfs -I -v -C test8203 8203
> mkdosfs 3.0.12 (29 Oct 2011)
> test8203 has 64 heads and 32 sectors per track,
> logical sector size is 512,
> using 0xf8 media descriptor, with 16406 sectors;
> file system has 2 12-bit FATs and 8 sectors per cluster.
FAT12....
2014 Jul 09
5
Possible memdisk issue
...ve
tried, newmkfloppyimg always tells me H=64 S=32 and then C is the
approximately the number of MB. And MEMDISK auto-determines those exact
same numbers. But if I manually call mkdosfs there's a lot more output,
most of it ignored by newmkfloppyimg. In particular, the output for
8203K and 8204K is different:
mkdosfs -I -v -C test8203 8203
mkdosfs 3.0.12 (29 Oct 2011)
test8203 has 64 heads and 32 sectors per track,
logical sector size is 512,
using 0xf8 media descriptor, with 16406 sectors;
file system has 2 12-bit FATs and 8 sectors per cluster.
FAT size is 8 sectors, and provides 2043 c...