search for: 8194

Hi all, I have 1 Card Digium TE412P and 2PRI E1. I have more problems with drops lines. The asterisk log is this: May 16 10:52:26 NOTICE[4465]: chan_zap.c:8194 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: Alarm (4) on Primary D-channel of span 1 May 16 10:52:26 WARNING[4465]: chan_zap.c:2287 pri_find_dchan: No D-channels available! Using Primary channel 16 as D-channel anyway! May 16 10:52:26 NOTICE[4465]: chan_zap.c:8194 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: No more alarm (5...

...ta, defaultTopicPrefix = ticker/, allowMultiCorrelatorsPerMsg = false, connectTimeout = 5000, clientMode = AUTO, maxPendingRequests = 1024, autoRestartOnDisconnection = false, authenticationOptions = , numStartAttempts = -1, reconnectionInterval = 3000, compat33x = false, serverAddress = [localhost:8194], keepAliveRequestInterval= 20000, keepAliveResponseTimeout= 5000, maxEventQueueSize= 10000, slowConsumerWarningHiWaterMark= 0.75, slowConsumerWarningLoWaterMark= 0.5] 2013/02/04 19:46:50.720 blpapi.PlatformConnection.3.Platform.0  b [INFO] Session established with: localhost/127.0.0.1:8194 2013/02...

Hello, All! It is a Piece of my log At the moment of a call: Jan 9 09:50:21 NOTICE[10902]: chan_zap.c:8194 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 3 -- Accepting call from '' to '0033444' on channel 1/1, span 1 -- Executing Dial("Zap/1-1", "SIP/3444|60|rgT") in new stack -- Called 3444 -- SIP/3444-0823e6b0 is ringing...

...ed patches. The virus checking software is Inoculan v4.00 - though I'm not convinced this is the problem. Any input would be greatly appreciated, thanks... --- Andrew Gray, Global Engineering Email: andrew.gray@csfb.com Credit Suisse-First Boston (Europe) Voice: +44 171 888 8194 One Cabot Square, LONDON E14 4QJ Fax: +44 171 888 4958

...e is free memory available? And the weird thing is that dom0 has done some swapping: # free -mt total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 1140 1052 88 0 2 12 -/+ buffers/cache: 1038 102 Swap: 8194 85 8109 Total: 9335 1138 8197 Shutting down domUs and making more memory available does not reverse the effect, dom0 does not allocate more memory. What am I missing here or is my xen setup acting strangely here? Best regards, Peter

...read.csv("K:\\Work\\SignalTest\\BP.csv", sep = "\t", header = FALSE, na.strings="") thedata The above statements give me precisely what I expect. The last few lines of output are: 8190 2009-06-16 49.30 8191 2009-06-17 48.40 8192 2009-06-18 47.72 8193 2009-06-19 48.83 8194 2009-06-22 46.85 8195 2009-06-23 47.11 8196 2009-06-24 46.97 8197 2009-06-25 47.43 I have loaded Rmetrics and PerformanceAnalytics, among other packages. I tried as.timeseries, but R2.9.1 tells me there is no such function. I tried as.ts(thedata), but that only replaces the date field by the row...

...an undocumented limitation of VDDK. For all the cases _we_ care about we're using --readonly, so that's lucky. (3) Using nbdkit-noextents-filter and nbdkit-stats-filter we can nicely measure the benefits of extents: With noextents (ie. force full copy): elapsed time: 323.815 s read: 8194 ops, 17179869696 bytes, 4.24437e+08 bits/s Without noextents (ie. rely on qemu-img skipping sparse bits): elapsed time: 237.41 s read: 833 ops, 1734345216 bytes, 5.84423e+07 bits/s extents: 70 ops, 135654246400 bytes, 4.57114e+09 bits/s Note if you deduct 120 seconds (see point (1) above)...

...m just guessing that this is the bug) then VDDK has a bug. > >(3) Using nbdkit-noextents-filter and nbdkit-stats-filter we can > >nicely measure the benefits of extents: > > > >With noextents (ie. force full copy): > > > > elapsed time: 323.815 s > > read: 8194 ops, 17179869696 bytes, 4.24437e+08 bits/s > > > >Without noextents (ie. rely on qemu-img skipping sparse bits): > > > > elapsed time: 237.41 s > > read: 833 ops, 1734345216 bytes, 5.84423e+07 bits/s > > extents: 70 ops, 135654246400 bytes, 4.57114e+09 bits/s &gt...

...it > >>>(3) Using nbdkit-noextents-filter and nbdkit-stats-filter we can > >>>nicely measure the benefits of extents: > >>> > >>>With noextents (ie. force full copy): > >>> > >>> elapsed time: 323.815 s > >>> read: 8194 ops, 17179869696 bytes, 4.24437e+08 bits/s > >>> > >>>Without noextents (ie. rely on qemu-img skipping sparse bits): > >>> > >>> elapsed time: 237.41 s > >>> read: 833 ops, 1734345216 bytes, 5.84423e+07 bits/s > >>> extents: 70...

...ry files. I don't know what else might eb the problem. many thanks Daniel Falster (biologist attempting to program in a world of non-programmers) ************************************** Daniel Falster Ecology Lab, Biological Sciences Macquarie University, NSW, 2109 Australia Ph:( 61 2) 9850 8194 Fax: (61 2) 9850 8245 http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/falster/

...l.. Is possible use the s3fs with ZFS (freebsd) ? how ? Thanks -- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: contato at mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) 4063-0407 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br

...e help me with this? have looked at all over the place! Thanks -- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: contato at mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) 4063-0407 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br

...509M 54720K CPU3 3 1:06 100.00% samba: task[kdc] (samba) -- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: contato at mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br

Performing a test install of CentOS 5, I no longer have the capability of requesting a minimal install as their was in CentOS 4. Is there any possibility this could added back in before final release? Thank you, Brett

...5 <gfid:55722221-66c3-4950-88cb-b8eeeb6951b8> 2013-06-20 06:34:05 <gfid:3597bbd5-29ec-4414-9b6c-c386e1b4334e> 2013-06-20 06:34:05 <gfid:d85a1dcd-f5bb-4dcc-83cc-73badd44d1d9> 2013-06-20 06:34:05 <gfid:95ee87d4-18b2-4ad7-8d11-bcc93ad745a7> 2013-06-20 06:34:05 <gfid:b9fa7988-8194-4520-9660-883e5d8d8fae> 2013-06-20 06:34:05 <gfid:06fac327-0e4a-4b88-96af-d34b78a7c356> 2013-06-20 06:34:05 <gfid:e2a4f473-f46a-47aa-a4a1-fd7b748ed862> 2013-06-20 06:34:05 <gfid:c6e4104e-0b34-4be7-aed9-29fa30d96517> 2013-06-20 06:34:05 /shareddocuments/Product Media/images/big/...

...yield the expected result of 23844, instead of 23843: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DskSize = 195369519, ReservedSecCnt = 32, SecPerClus = 64, NumFATs=2, BytesPerSect = 512 Numerator = 195369519 * 32 + 2 * 64 = 195369615 Denominator = 64 * 512 / 4 * 2 = 8194 FatSz = (195369615 / 8194) + 1 = 23844 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *TL;DR*: The Ridgecrop Fat Size computation algorithm is wrong, and, whether justified or not, the existing Syslinux check does catch FATs that are missing addressable sectors. I ha...

...onditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux"... (gdb) set args -vvvc (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/sbin/asterisk -vvvc [New Thread 8192 (LWP 920)] [New Thread 16385 (LWP 927)] [New Thread 8194 (LWP 928)] == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf': Found Asterisk CVS-03/31/03-17:20:21, Copyright (C) 1999-2001 Linux Support Services, Inc. Written by Mark Spencer <markster@linux-support.net> ========================================================================= == Parsing...

...:7365 0x5644a5 cp_parser_assignment_expression ../../../src/lnx64/gcc/cp/parser.c:7590 0x566052 cp_parser_expression ../../../src/lnx64/gcc/cp/parser.c:7741 0x5598b2 cp_parser_lambda_body ../../../src/lnx64/gcc/cp/parser.c:8632 0x5598b2 cp_parser_lambda_expression ../../../src/lnx64/gcc/cp/parser.c:8194 0x5598b2 cp_parser_primary_expression ../../../src/lnx64/gcc/cp/parser.c:4085 0x5607e2 cp_parser_postfix_expression ../../../src/lnx64/gcc/cp/parser.c:5629 0x55f14a cp_parser_unary_expression ../../../src/lnx64/gcc/cp/parser.c:6685 0x564007 cp_parser_binary_expression ../../../src/lnx64/gcc/cp/pars...

...ad_smb_length_return_keepalive(1187) got smb length of 519 [2009/03/25 10:31:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(645) [2009/03/25 10:31:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(655) size=519 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=22 smb_reh=0 smb_err=49152 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=51205 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=26268 smb_uid=8194 smb_mid=2 smt_wct=4 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]= 519 (0x207) smb_vwv[ 2]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 3]= 288 (0x120) smb_bcc=476 [2009/03/25 10:31:25, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2233) [000] A1 82 01 1C 30 82 01 18 A0 03 0A 01 01 A1 0C 06 ?...0... ?....?.. [010] 0A 2B 06 01 04...

...if it's not too much work. >> >(3) Using nbdkit-noextents-filter and nbdkit-stats-filter we can >> >nicely measure the benefits of extents: >> > >> >With noextents (ie. force full copy): >> > >> > elapsed time: 323.815 s >> > read: 8194 ops, 17179869696 bytes, 4.24437e+08 bits/s >> > >> >Without noextents (ie. rely on qemu-img skipping sparse bits): >> > >> > elapsed time: 237.41 s >> > read: 833 ops, 1734345216 bytes, 5.84423e+07 bits/s >> > extents: 70 ops, 135654246400 bytes...