Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "81900".
Did you mean:
1900
2019 Feb 25
4
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...: 10822 ms ( 13.2%)
TPI Stream Layout: 1501 ms ( 1.8%)
Globals Stream Layout: 770 ms ( 0.9%)
Commit to Disk: 7007 ms ( 8.6%)
Commit Output File: 19 ms ( 0.0%)
-------------------------------------------------
Total Link Time: 81900 ms (100.0%)
Our target is for < 20 seconds linking, anything bellow 40 seconds would be ok. Ideal times would be around 8s (in which it will mostly beat link.exe incremental linking).
My tip for profiling is using superluminal
(https://www.superluminal.eu/) its the easiest way to see everythin...
2019 Feb 24
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
Leonardo, to answer to your questions, yes to all of them You can take a
look at this prototype/proposal: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55585
Overall, computing ghashes in parallel at link-time and merging Types with them
is less costly that the current approach to merging. The 35sec you’re seeing
for merging should go down to about 15sec. The patch doesn’t parallelize
(yet) the Type merging
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...t; TPI Stream Layout: 1501 ms ( 1.8%)
> Globals Stream Layout: 770 ms ( 0.9%)
> Commit to Disk: 7007 ms ( 8.6%)
> Commit Output File: 19 ms ( 0.0%)
> -------------------------------------------------
> Total Link Time: 81900 ms (100.0%)
>
> Our target is for < 20 seconds linking, anything bellow 40 seconds would be ok. Ideal times would be around 8s (in which it will mostly beat link.exe incremental linking).
>
> My tip for profiling is using superluminal
> (https://www.superluminal.eu/) its the easie...
2019 Feb 25
3
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...1501 ms ( 1.8%)
> > Globals Stream Layout: 770 ms ( 0.9%)
> > Commit to Disk: 7007 ms ( 8.6%)
> > Commit Output File: 19 ms ( 0.0%)
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > Total Link Time: 81900 ms (100.0%)
> >
> > Our target is for < 20 seconds linking, anything bellow 40 seconds would be ok. Ideal times would be around 8s (in which it will mostly beat link.exe incremental linking).
> >
> > My tip for profiling is using superluminal
> > (https://www.superl...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...Globals Stream Layout: 770 ms ( 0.9%)
>> > > Commit to Disk: 7007 ms ( 8.6%)
>> > > Commit Output File: 19 ms ( 0.0%)
>> > > -------------------------------------------------
>> > > Total Link Time: 81900 ms (100.0%)
>> > >
>> > > Our target is for < 20 seconds linking, anything bellow 40 seconds would be ok. Ideal times would be around 8s (in which it will mostly beat link.exe incremental linking).
>> > >
>> > > My tip for profiling is using superl...
2019 Feb 25
5
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...ayout: 770 ms ( 0.9%)
> >> > > Commit to Disk: 7007 ms ( 8.6%)
> >> > > Commit Output File: 19 ms ( 0.0%)
> >> > > -------------------------------------------------
> >> > > Total Link Time: 81900 ms (100.0%)
> >> > >
> >> > > Our target is for < 20 seconds linking, anything bellow 40 seconds would be ok. Ideal times would be around 8s (in which it will mostly beat link.exe incremental linking).
> >> > >
> >> > > My tip for profi...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...Globals Stream Layout: 770 ms ( 0.9%)
>> > > Commit to Disk: 7007 ms ( 8.6%)
>> > > Commit Output File: 19 ms ( 0.0%)
>> > > -------------------------------------------------
>> > > Total Link Time: 81900 ms (100.0%)
>> > >
>> > > Our target is for < 20 seconds linking, anything bellow 40 seconds would be ok. Ideal times would be around 8s (in which it will mostly beat link.exe incremental linking).
>> > >
>> > > My tip for profiling is using superl...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...0.9%)
> > >> > > Commit to Disk: 7007 ms ( 8.6%)
> > >> > > Commit Output File: 19 ms ( 0.0%)
> > >> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > Total Link Time: 81900 ms (100.0%)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Our target is for < 20 seconds linking, anything bellow 40 seconds would be ok. Ideal times would be around 8s (in which it will mostly beat link.exe incremental linking).
> > >> > >
> > >> > &...
2019 Feb 27
4
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...; > Commit to Disk: 7007 ms ( 8.6%)
> > > > >> > > Commit Output File: 19 ms ( 0.0%)
> > > > >> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> > > Total Link Time: 81900 ms (100.0%)
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Our target is for < 20 seconds linking, anything bellow 40
> seconds would be ok. Ideal times would be around 8s (in which it will
> mostly beat link.exe incremental linking).
> > > > >...
2019 Feb 28
3
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...t; >> > > Commit to Disk: 7007 ms ( 8.6%)
> > > >> > > Commit Output File: 19 ms ( 0.0%)
> > > >> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > Total Link Time: 81900 ms (100.0%)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Our target is for < 20 seconds linking, anything bellow 40 seconds would be ok. Ideal times would be around 8s (in which it will mostly beat link.exe incremental linking).
> > > >> > >
> >...