Displaying 20 results from an estimated 25 matches for "814e".
Did you mean:
814
2018 Apr 27
2
[DbgInfo] Potential bug in location list address ranges
...0, #85 ; 0x55
8140: cmp lr, ip
8142: bne.n 8168 <foo+0x44>
8144: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #2]
8148: ldrb r3, [r4, #2]
814a: cmp r3, ip
814c: it ne
814e: popne {r4, r6, r7, pc} // a function
return
8150: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #1]
8154: ldrb r3, [r4, #1]
8156: cmp r3, ip
8158: bne.n 8168 <foo+0x44>
815a:...
2018 Apr 27
0
[DbgInfo] Potential bug in location list address ranges
...cmp lr, ip
> 8142: bne.n 8168 <foo+0x44>
>
> 8144: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #2]
> 8148: ldrb r3, [r4, #2]
> 814a: cmp r3, ip
> 814c: it ne
> 814e: popne {r4, r6, r7, pc} // a function return
>
> 8150: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #1]
> 8154: ldrb r3, [r4, #1]
> 8156: cmp r3, ip
> 8158: bne.n 8168 <foo+0x44>...
2018 Apr 27
2
[DbgInfo] Potential bug in location list address ranges
...0, #85 ; 0x55
8140: cmp lr, ip
8142: bne.n 8168 <foo+0x44>
8144: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #2]
8148: ldrb r3, [r4, #2]
814a: cmp r3, ip
814c: it ne
814e: popne {r4, r6, r7, pc} // a function return
8150: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #1]
8154: ldrb r3, [r4, #1]
8156: cmp r3, ip
8158: bne.n 8168 <foo+0x44>
815a:...
2018 May 07
2
[DbgInfo] Potential bug in location list address ranges
...x44>
>>
>>
>>
>> 8144: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #2]
>>
>> 8148: ldrb r3, [r4, #2]
>>
>> 814a: cmp r3, ip
>>
>> 814c: it ne
>>
>> 814e: popne {r4, r6, r7, pc} // a
>> function return
>>
>>
>>
>> 8150: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #1]
>>
>> 8154: ldrb r3, [r4, #1]
>>
>> 8156: cmp r3, ip
>...
2018 Apr 27
0
[DbgInfo] Potential bug in location list address ranges
...8142: bne.n 8168 <foo+0x44>
>
>
>
> 8144: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #2]
>
> 8148: ldrb r3, [r4, #2]
>
> 814a: cmp r3, ip
>
> 814c: it ne
>
> 814e: popne {r4, r6, r7, pc} // a
> function return
>
>
>
> 8150: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #1]
>
> 8154: ldrb r3, [r4, #1]
>
> 8156: cmp r3, ip
>
> 8158: b...
2010 Jan 14
0
[PATCH] Include subvolume= and metadata_ratio= in /cat/proc
...'){
+ seq_puts(seq, ",subvol=");
+ seq_puts(seq, vfs->mnt_root->d_name.name);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&vfs->mnt_root->d_lock);
return 0;
}
--
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512
2011 Nov 30
11
Resize command syntax wrong?
Currently the resize command is under filesystem, and takes a path to the mounted filesystem. This seems wrong to me. Shouldn''t it be under device, and take a path to a device to resize? Otherwise, how can a resize operation when you have multiple devices make any sense?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to
2018 May 07
0
[DbgInfo] Potential bug in location list address ranges
...bne.n 8168 <foo+0x44>
>
>
>
> 8144: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #2]
>
> 8148: ldrb r3, [r4, #2]
>
> 814a: cmp r3, ip
>
> 814c: it ne
>
> 814e: popne {r4, r6, r7, pc} // a function return
>
>
>
> 8150: ldrb.w ip, [r1, #1]
>
> 8154: ldrb r3, [r4, #1]
>
> 8156: cmp r3, ip
>
> 8158:...
2010 Aug 03
1
make snapshot main volume, delete all others?
Fedora provides yum-fs-snapshot. If installed, on each package
installation or update a snapshot of all btrfs filesystems is taken, so
it is possible to revert the installation/update.
Suppose an update failed and I want to get back: with
# btrfs subvolume set-default yum-snapshot-whatever /
I define which snapshot to use at the next boot.
After rebooting I decide I really want to stay with
2011 Oct 19
1
[RFC] aptitude & BTRFS slowness
...."
sync
sleep 5s
sync
echo "Remove $ROLLBACK"
btrfs subvolume delete "$ROLLBACK"
------------------------------------------------------------
--
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijack@inwind.it>
Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512
2010 Oct 25
2
[PATCH] Btrfs: allow subvol deletion by unprivileged user with -o user_subvol_rm_allowed
Add a mount option user_subvol_rm_allowed that allows users to delete a
(potentially non-empty!) subvol when they would otherwise we allowed to do
an rmdir(2). We duplicate the may_delete() checks from the core VFS code
to implement identical security checks (minus the directory size check).
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 +
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |
2020 Jun 08
0
Can't share a mailbox
...name =
}
}
protocol imap {
mail_plugins = quota acl imap_sieve imap_acl
}
----------------------------------------
Does anyone see what I'm doing wrong here?
Kind regards,
--
Maxime DERCHE Information System Consulting France | NVMQVAM SOLVS
https://www.mdisc.fr/
OpenPGP Key ID: 0x814E02A25697FD13
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 8B7B 60C9 1095 A198 C883 5205 814E 02A2 5697 FD13
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipe...
2010 Dec 14
0
[PATCH] BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH: store and use the last key found
...BTRFS_IOC_INO_LOOKUP _IOWR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 18, \
struct btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_args)
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg07513.html
--
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijack@inwind.it>
Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512
2010 Jan 09
2
Still Problems with /dev/btrfs-control
Thanks for the quick reply!
But I still have problems with btrfsctl:
> stat /dev/btrfs-control
File: `/dev/btrfs-control''
Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 block special file
Device: ch/12d Inode: 659848 Links: 1 Device type: a,3e
Access: (0644/brw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2010-01-09 11:31:15.757979602 +0100
2010 Feb 24
2
Resizing a btrfs managed partition
Hi,
Let me know if this is the wrong place to ask...
I''m using Fedora 12 x86_64, mostly with the newer 21.6.32 kernel, and
have a single btrfs filesystem within a 120Gb partition.
I''d like to extend the space btrfs can use. One option is presumably
add a new device to btrfs, but I was hoping to simple resize the
existing partition to say 160Gb.
With ext4 I might do
2010 Feb 17
0
[PATCH 2/2 V2] btrfs, a new tool to manage a btrfs filesystem; man page
...table for any uses other than benchmarking and review.
+Please refer to the btrfs wiki http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for
+further details.
+.SH SEE ALSO
+.BR mkfs.btrfs (8)
--
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijack@inwind.it>
Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512
2010 Apr 16
2
[RFC] btrfs, udev and btrfs
...9;t know the
changes which may be required to work for other distributions (like fedora),
but I am very interested in knowing those.
Comments are welcome.
BR
Goffredo
--
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2010 Feb 22
3
Re: [PATCH 0/3 V3] btrfs: a new tool to manage a btrfs filesystem
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@gmail.com> wrote:
> filesystem resize [+/-]<size>[gkm]|max <filesystem>
-filesystem resize [+/-]<size>[gkm]|max <filesystem>
+filesystem resize [+/-]<size>[gkm]|max <dev>
This command works on devices, not paths.
> Resize a filesystem identified by <path>. The
2010 Nov 16
2
[Btrfs-Progs] Update for lzo support
- Add incompat flag, otherwise btrfs-progs will report error
when operating on btrfs filesystems mounted with lzo option.
- Allow to turn on lzo compression for defrag operation:
# btrfs filesystem defragment -c[zlib, lzo] <file>
Note: "-c zlib" will fail, because that''s how getopt() works
for optional arguments.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan
2010 May 19
10
R: default subvolume abilities/restrictions
Hi Anthony,
I think that for you may be interested to read this thread
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-btrfs/2009/11/20/6588643/thread
and to read a my blog about this argument
http://kreijack.blogspot.com/2010/01/linux-btrfs-example-of-layout.html
Regards
Goffredo
>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: anthony@extof.me
>Data: 19/05/2010 8.50
>A: