search for: 80m

...based network... I've got a small network (10 users) running samba on a Linux box with a HP network printer. This is working so well, that the only network problems that I have are with printers other printers "shared" by Win 95. Therefore: I was planning to turn an old 486 with an 80M HDD into a print server, however the minimum redhat installation is 86MB!! Does anyone know of a small distribution to achieve this? The printer would be accessed via the main samba server, therefore it needs just enough to emulate an ethernet to parallel printer box. Regards, Andrew Dennison Eng...

...is 11 MB/sec (megabytes) But if I copy a 1 gig file over that link I get 110 MB/sec. Why is DRBD so slow? I am not using drbd encryption because of the back to back link. Here is a part of my drbd config: # cat /etc/drbd.conf global { usage-count yes; } common { protocol C; syncer { rate 80M; } net { allow-two-primaries; } } resource xenotrs { device /dev/drbd6; disk /dev/vg0/xenotrs; meta-disk internal; on baldur.somedomain.local { address 10.99.99.1:7793; } on thor.somedomain.local { address 10.99.99.2:7793; } } Kind regards, Coert

...process can dump profile data > into its own file named using pid. ... or you can specify a more specific name that describes what's under test, instead of %p. > This will create huge requirement on the disk storage. For > instance, clang's raw profile size is typically 80M -- if the > instrumented clang is used to build a medium to large size project > (such as clang itself), profile data can easily use up hundreds of > Gig bytes of local storage. This argument is kind of confusing. It says that one profile is typicially 80M, then claims that this...

...iding others, %p substitution needs to be specified in either the command line or an environment variable so that different process can dump profile data into its own file named using pid. This will create huge requirement on the disk storage. For instance, clang's raw profile size is typically 80M -- if the instrumented clang is used to build a medium to large size project (such as clang itself), profile data can easily use up hundreds of Gig bytes of local storage. 2) pid can also be recycled. This means that some of the profile data may be overridden without being noticed. The way to solv...

...mount of headroom). > >Of course, you might want more than a single server for redundancy. I had redundancy in mind, but wasn't sure a single server could manage such outputs, so two 1425s loadbalancing the streams would do this job comfortably? Now to worry about getting a low latency 80M connection or two 40M's If I use round robin dns for connections I could have the servers in geographically separate locations, right? >Mike Thanks again Mike, David. ___________________________________________________________ Tiscali Broadband only 9.99 a month for your first 3 months!...

Hi all, I have two seperate questions that both deal with the way R handels data sets: First, I am trying to read a data set of 80M into R. I am using read.table(). The file is a tab file and I have tested the function for a small amount of lines. It seems to work fine (i.e. correct amount of columns and rows). However, when I try to read the full data set, R outputs a memory limit error and stops responding to any command even...

...cribes what's under > test, instead of %p. > yes -- but the problem still exists -- each training process will need its own copy of raw profile. > > > This will create huge requirement on the disk storage. For > > instance, clang's raw profile size is typically 80M -- if the > > instrumented clang is used to build a medium to large size project > > (such as clang itself), profile data can easily use up hundreds of > > Gig bytes of local storage. > > This argument is kind of confusing. It says that one profile is > typiciall...

...'s under > test, instead of %p. > > yes -- but the problem still exists -- each training process will need its own copy of raw profile. > > > > This will create huge requirement on the disk storage. For > > instance, clang's raw profile size is typically 80M -- if the > > instrumented clang is used to build a medium to large size project > > (such as clang itself), profile data can easily use up hundreds of > > Gig bytes of local storage. > > This argument is kind of confusing. It says that one profile is > typicial...

...instead of %p. >> >> yes -- but the problem still exists -- each training process will need its own copy of raw profile. >> >> >> > This will create huge requirement on the disk storage. For >> > instance, clang's raw profile size is typically 80M -- if the >> > instrumented clang is used to build a medium to large size project >> > (such as clang itself), profile data can easily use up hundreds of >> > Gig bytes of local storage. >> >> This argument is kind of confusing. It says that one prof...

...; substitution needs to be specified in either the command line or an > environment variable so that different process can dump profile data into > its own file named using pid. This will create huge requirement on the disk > storage. For instance, clang's raw profile size is typically 80M -- if the > instrumented clang is used to build a medium to large size project (such as > clang itself), profile data can easily use up hundreds of Gig bytes of > local storage. > 2) pid can also be recycled. This means that some of the profile data may > be overridden without being...

...on needs to be specified in either the command line or an >> environment variable so that different process can dump profile data into >> its own file named using pid. This will create huge requirement on the disk >> storage. For instance, clang's raw profile size is typically 80M -- if the >> instrumented clang is used to build a medium to large size project (such as >> clang itself), profile data can easily use up hundreds of Gig bytes of >> local storage. >> 2) pid can also be recycled. This means that some of the profile data may >> be overr...

...ms. The backend storage server does dynamic load > balancing so that it can achieve very high IO throughput with high > parallelism (at both FE/client side and backend). > > a) Single profile without profile merging : ~60m > b) Profile merging enabled: > b.1) pool size == 1: ~80m > b.2) pool size == 2: ~47m > b.3) pool size == 3: ~43m > b.4) pool size == 4: ~40m40s > b.5) pool size == 5: ~38m50s > b.6) pool size == 10: ~36m48s > b.7) pool size == 32: ~36m24s > c) >3000 profile file without profile merging (%p): ~35m24s &gt...

Full_Name: Doug Hershberger Version: 1.2.2 OS: Red Hat-Linux 7.0 Submission from: (NULL) (216.99.65.36) In the R FAQ I find the following entry explaining that R no longer has problems with memory. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#Why%20does%20R%20run%20out%20of%20of%20memory%3f However in my installation: R Version 1.2.2 (2001-02-26) Installed from the red hat RPM on your

hello, i am a newbie to this list and i don't know if this has been posted before (if so, plzz accept my apologies) i just noticed a nice mini-howto on ext2-ext3 conversion at http://www.symonds.net/~rajesh/howto/ext3/index.html i think that maybe a link can be added to this after the download section... cheers Sayamindu *********************************************************************

...stitution needs to be specified in either the command line or an > environment variable so that different process can dump profile data > into its own file named using pid. This will create huge requirement > on the disk storage. For instance, clang's raw profile size is > typically 80M -- if the instrumented clang is used to build a medium > to large size project (such as clang itself), profile data can > easily use up hundreds of Gig bytes of local storage. > 2) pid can also be recycled. This means that some of the profile data > may be overridden without being notic...

> What is taking time, scanning inodes on the destination, or recopying the entire > backup because of either source read speed, target write speed or a slow interconnect > between them? It takes hours to traverse all these directories with loads of small files on the backup server. That is the limiting factor. Not even copying: just checking the timestamp and size of the old copies.

...ot; for a HTML browser interface to help. Type "q()" to quit R. Fatal error: unable to restore saved data (remove .RData or increase memory If I try with R --vsize 30M, it does the same with perhaps extra thrashing of the disk. I am running Debian Linux 2.2.17 on an intel PC with 80M of RAM. Is there any thing I can check to help sort this problem? I didn't have the problem with the older version of R. Thanks Ross Darnell -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-....

Hi there I came across this problem with PXELINUX over the last couple of days. The computer in question is a Compaq Prosignia 300 Server which I am using as a X Terminal. The Linux kernel only detects 16m of ram in the computer yet it has 80Meg. When you specify the mem option to kernel it seems as if pxelinux isn't putting the initrd image in the correct memory location and thus it won't even bootup. This setup was working before I decided to upgrade ltsp from 1.x to the latest version. Before I had a specific kernel compiled...

...5.3, and this installed gcc-4.1.2-44.el5. However, there isn't any corresponding debuginfo RPM on the mirror: [kMDIAG at vm01 rql_mdiag]$ links -dump http://debuginfo.centos.org/5/i386/ | grep -i gcc-debuginfo-4.1.2- [1088][ ] [1089]gcc-debuginfo-4.1.2-14.el5.i386.rpm 09-Nov-2007 23:47 80M [1090][ ] [1091]gcc-debuginfo-4.1.2-42.el5.i386.rpm 26-May-2008 22:56 81M 1089. http://debuginfo.centos.org/5/i386/gcc-debuginfo-4.1.2-14.el5.i386.rpm 1091. http://debuginfo.centos.org/5/i386/gcc-debuginfo-4.1.2-42.el5.i386.rpm I assume that the debuginfo RPMs got generated at the same time...

...'ve got a small network (10 users) running samba on a Linux box with a HP > network printer. This is working so well, that the only network problems > that I have are with printers other printers "shared" by Win 95. Therefore: > > I was planning to turn an old 486 with an 80M HDD into a print server, > however the minimum redhat installation is 86MB!! Does anyone know of a > small distribution to achieve this? The printer would be accessed via the > main samba server, therefore it needs just enough to emulate an ethernet to > parallel printer box. Try Debia...