Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "8030636".
2011 Jun 01
2
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS
Hello.
I am not sure this is the right place to ask but here is my question. About a year ago there was a fix of some obscure bug (rdar://problem/8030636 which is located on the internal Apple bugtracker I believe and so not available to the general public :))
Some discussion can be found here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100531/102160.html. Unfortunately, no real testcase is provided, just abstract scenario descrip...
2011 Jun 01
0
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS
On Jun 1, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Galanov, Sergey wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am not sure this is the right place to ask but here is my question. About a year ago there was a fix of some obscure bug (rdar://problem/8030636 which is located on the internal Apple bugtracker I believe and so not available to the general public J)
> Some discussion can be found here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100531/102160.html. Unfortunately, no real testcase is provided, just abstract scenario des...
2011 Jun 02
2
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS
...rgey
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS
On Jun 1, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Galanov, Sergey wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am not sure this is the right place to ask but here is my question.
> About a year ago there was a fix of some obscure bug (rdar://problem/8030636 which is located on the internal Apple bugtracker I believe and so not available to the general public J) Some discussion can be found here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100531/102160.html. Unfortunately, no real testcase is provided, just abstract scenario descript...
2013 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] r192750 - Enable MI Sched for x86.
...3.2
>> %z = select i1 %c, double %a, double %y
>> @@ -65,7 +64,7 @@ return:
>> ; Sink instructions with dead EFLAGS defs.
>>
>> ; FIXME: Unfail the zzz test if we can correctly mark pregs with the kill flag.
>> -;
>> +;
>> ; See <rdar://problem/8030636>. This test isn't valid after we made machine
>> ; sinking more conservative about sinking instructions that define a preg into a
>> ; block when we don't know if the preg is killed within the current block.
>>
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/sse2.ll
>...