search for: 802.3ad

On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > >> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>> As subject says, 802.3ad bonding is not working with virtio network model. >>> >>> The only errors I see is: >>> >>> No 802.3ad response from the link partner for any adapters

On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > >> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>> As subject says, 802.3ad bonding is not working with virtio network model. >>> >>> The only errors I see is: >>> >>> No 802.3ad response from the link partner for any adapters

Does anyone have some tips for setting up Broadcom's 802.3AD support or just getting their driver compiled / installed? First off, I noticed redhat claims the broadcom bcm5708 driver has been added to the rhel4 kernel. But I don't see /proc/net/nicinfo which broadcom claims the driver creates when it's successfully initialized. So, I'm trying to build the driver based on the

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:48:26 +0100 > On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: >> >>> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>>> As subject says, 802.3ad bonding is not working with virtio network model.

Hi all, Does any one have 802.3ad (mode 4) working on there Centos6 KVM setup? Of course we are also bridging here. - aurf

Hi all, Don't mean to double post as I sent this to the general Centos list. But, does any one have 802.3ad (mode 4) working on there Centos6 KVM setup? This would be a bridge+bond setup of course. If not possible, would I still bond the interfaces on the switch and then bond them in the guest rather then from within the hypervisor? - aurf

On 01/30/2016 07:59 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:48:26 +0100 > >> On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >>> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>>>> As subject

On 01/30/2016 07:59 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:48:26 +0100 > >> On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >>> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>>>> As subject

Hi Stephen, there was a bug in bridging bonds. multicast packets needed for 802.3ad netif_carrier_ok() were dropped. attached patch works for me. Cheers, Vlad. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fix_br_multicast.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1344 bytes Desc: not available Url :

I'm try to bond a few interfaces together with the hopes of getting increased throughput, and I'm using a cisco Catalyst 2900 as the switch. I've tried using mode 0, 5, and 6 with nothing special on the switch, and mode 4 with some ports "trunked" together (I have a feeling that the "trunking" that the 2900 does is not 802.3ad, as it disabled the ports it saw as

I am working on setting up an NFS server, which will mainly serve files to web servers, and I want to setup two bonds. I have a question regarding *which* bonding mode to use. None of the documentation I have read suggests any mode is "better" than other with the exception of specific use cases (e.g. switch does not support 802.3ad, active-backup). Since my switch *does* support

Hi, may be there are some best practice suggestions for the "best mode" for channel bonding interface? Or in other words, when should/would I use which mode? E.g. I do have some fileservers connected to the users lan and to some ISCSI Storages. Or some Webservers only connected to the LAN. The switches are all new cisco models. I've read sone docs (1), (2) and (3) so the theory

I want to bond together both interfaces on my dom0 using IPMP to provide a redundant path. Is this supported? - I''ve done a google and found no specific mention of doing exactly this so I''d like to know if it is possible before I attempt it. Many thanks, Matt. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I have a bonded interface running in mode 1 which is active/passive and no issue with this. I need to change it to mode 0 for active/active setup. Does mode 0 is dependent on the switches configuration? My setup is: 2 links from bonded interface is connected to different switches. When I change to mode0 from mode1 , bond0 is not coming up. These are the steps I performed 1) changed to options

Hi all, Read many posts on the subject. Using 802.3ad. Few problems; Cannot ping some hosts on the network, they are all up. Cannot resolve via DNS which is one of the hosts that I cannot ping, internal nor external DNS hosts. Unplugging the NICS and plugging them back in will then not allow pining if the default d=gateway. When cold booting it somewhat works, some hosts are pingable while

Hi, I have 2 servers running CentOS 6.3. Each has four 1gb Ethernet ports. I have bonded all four ports on each server and patched them to the same switch (following the instructions at http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces). I have created aggregated trunks for the servers respective ports on the switch. The switch reports that the ports are up and that the Link Aggregation is

Hi everyone, I'm trying to use samba in a small video post production house but we are not getting the performance we expected. Our setup: - CenOS 5.6 x86-64 - samba.x86_64 (3.0.33-3.29.el5_6.2 and 3.6.0rc1) - Intel based server (One 4 core Xeon E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 GB RAM) - 4 Intel Gigagit ethernet NIC ports with 802.3ad bonding connected to a switch configured tu use 802.3ad - 8 2TB 7.2

Hi! I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the corresponding configuration for the master is ( /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0): TYPE=Bond BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes NAME=bond0 DEVICE=bond0 ONBOOT=yes IPADDR=10.3.20.131 PREFIX=24

I have nic bonding (mode=802.3ad) setup on 2 servers, both running Centos 5.5 In the "Active Aggregator Info", on one reports 4 ports - which is correct - but the other only reports 3 ports. It's always eth0 that shows a different aggregator ID. Changing the cables around so it hits a different port on the switch makes no difference. The switch is correctly configured for the port

Hi, I have been playing this weekend with bonding on PCI netcards and found that all of netcards I have, but old 3com, do not support MII. So bonding is not going to happen with them. Do you have some pci netcards supporting MII successfully running on bonging? Thanks, David Hrb??