search for: 802.1q

Hello, I''m trying to shape traffic by IP addresses and by 802.1q vlans. But when I add 802.1q filter filters output looks strange. Maybe I''m missing some options to TC? Thanks, Mindaugas # ./bin/tc -s -d filter show dev eth0 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh

Hello. I''m new to the list and I hope this is not a FAQ. I searched the archives and didn''t find an answer... Quick question : Is there a limitation if the vif code cutting at 1500 bytes ?? I''m trying to implement an IPv6 router/Firewall (2 XenU) Xen 2.0.6, Linux 2.6 is used on xen0 and XenU. The physical machine has 2 interfaces, eth0 (which is connected to an

Hi, I have a box with XEN enabled. Specs : Gentoo 10.0 AMD64 XEN 4.0.0 The server is connected on our network through two physicals NIC. Actually, I''m using a VLAN on each NIC and bridge the domU in it. But now I must create an additional domU which should be in an different VLAN. The best solution is to set a trunk on the switch and use 802.1q directly on the dom0. I found this site

Hi All, I posted this question several days before, as if no one reply, any help, hint would be highly appreciated! PLEASE SAVE ME! Now I am having trouble in Ethernet bridge and 802.1Q VLAN, I have the following network: Internet | | Gateway | | <--------- If insert one Ethernet bridge box in here ,somethings changes | H u b ( one normal

We are using Centos behind an F5 Bigip load balancer. The linux box is using bonding and tagged VLAN's Everything works fine except that when traffic is forwarded from the BigIP to the linux box on the VLAN where the web server is running the linux box returns the traffic on the wrong VLAN, It returns traffic on the lowest ordered VLAN. ie. here is a tcpdump on my load balancer showing

Hello What I''m looking for is how to configure the Linux QoS module to do global rate limitation for two (or more) 802.1q pseudo network devices. I naturally suppose there is a possibility with IFB. I don''t want to use IMQ because it''s not integrated to my kernel v2.6.21.1 and I didn''t find IMQ patches for it nor for the iptables package I use (v1.3.7).

My actual scenario is: -Hundreds PCs in a internal network (fixed IP), divided in +- 6 different subnets -A +- 6 customers with leased lines -A Cisco Catalyst 4006 connecting groups of PCs to corresponding customers (imagine a Call Center company) -Works fine. The problem: Frequently, it''s necessary to migrate dozens PCs from a customer to another. You know, change all IPs and

Hello, I''m having some dificulties troubleshooting a rather strange setup. We have a Linux box, that is supposed to act as a shaper. For this, there are several 802.1q vlans transported to one of the interfaces. So the setup is something like this: ------------------- - Cisco Router - -------------------

Hello, My name is Ferm?n Gal?n and I work as Research Engineer at CTTC, Spain. I'm trying to configure a bridge with brctl to switch VLAN tagged traffic (802.1q), but I'm getting some problems. In particular, I've a physical interface (eth2) connected to a Cisco trunk port (so, the traffic to/from eth2 is tagged). I've added eth2 to a bridge ('brctl addif somebrige

Hi,All I'd like to use iptables to set TOS according to the 802.1Q P bits in ethernet header,but I got no idea.You know,we can use this to match mac:iptables -A FORWARD -m mac --mac-source 00:e0:4c:3b:b6:d5 -j DROP.So can iptables supply commands to match P bits in ethernet header?(If so,I can set:iptables -A FORWARD -p pbits --pbits 0x5 -j TOS --set-tos 0xb8.) Any suggestion is highly

Hello to everybody, Sorry if my english isn?t very good. I need pass 802.1q through a VPN between two offices. I have mounted a WRT54GL, with OpenWRT firmware, conected to a switch trunk port in both offices. In the switch of the first office I have created five tagged VLANs and I need pass these VLAN to the second offices where it has created it too. Can I do this with Tinc in HUB/Switch

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bridge-nf-0.0.8-against-2.4.19-modified-william.diff.gz Type: application/octet-stream Size: 9971 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20030723/57d1c8a3/bridge-nf-0.0.8-against-2.4.19-modified-william.diff.obj

Hi All, For my issue, first thanks to ALL, I have some idea of it. Also Thank Peter for his kind remind, I would become one good guy in this list. Most mentioned MTU, but how I assure that the problem is just MTU, how I debug it? Here is my bridge configuration: Internet | | Gateway | | eth0 Ethernet Bridge | eth1 | H u b ( one normal hub

Hello At first I must tell you that I´m a real newbie with Linux (and english as well...) I´m using 2 vlans and shaping works quite well without vlan Now I want to do load balancing at these vlans. Any vlan should get the same minimum/maximum bandwidth of download and use the bandwidth that isn´t used by the other one at the moment. But with vlan the shaping doesn´t work. Can you please tell me

Hello, Is it possible with a linux Bow to route différents VLANs, like a router cisco can does ? Thank for your answers Laurent Foucher _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

I need to shape traffic from some IP on one LAN, but I''m in trouble. There is a linux 2.4.26 connected to the Internet (eth0) / LAN(eth1) doing NAT. I''m using VLANs in the LAN Interface, that is connected to a 3Com SuperStack II in a 802.1Q tagged port. I want to create a class that will limit the traffic at 384Kbit/s. I want to create two leaf classes that limit the traffic at

Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).

I'm trying to bridge a mix of 802.1q tagged and untagged Ethernet frames through the new Ethernet over GRE functionality in kernel 2.6.28 The hosts handling the tunnel (192.168.200.6, 192.168.200.2) are connected together through with a simple cross cable through their eth1 interface. The switches are connected to their respective eth0 interface, which is bridged with their respective gretap

Hello You must add first: vlan (tagged) to eth2 eth2 interface is not tagged by default and not know vlan-s . It is like a cisco if you have 24 ports in cisco by default all ports are in vlan1. if you want to do trunk (with vlans) you myst add (vlans) to this ports (tagged or untagged) So you can compare that all interfaces in linux by default are in one vlan(but not tagged). (only for