Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "801488".
Did you mean:
8.1488
2003 Aug 26
1
Long pause.
...6668 1424 164 1424 168 3292 165 2 27 71
3 0 0 801456 2808 600 6672 1016 264 1016 264 2682 154 7 24 69
1 1 0 801580 2828 600 7048 940 112 1008 128 2377 298 41 35 24
2 0 0 801528 2780 600 7228 1108 0 1288 0 2725 201 2 25 73
2 0 0 801488 2744 600 7636 656 0 1064 0 2237 294 1 25 74
1 1 0 801568 2852 600 7952 716 0 1032 128 2430 285 1 25 74
2 1 0 801616 2780 596 8464 540 0 784 0 1642 279 34 16 50
2 1 0 801576 3844 596 8568 656 0 1028 24 2308 419 12 32...
2013 May 01
2
Factors and Multinomial Logistic Regression
Dear All,
I am trying to reproduce the example that I found online here
http://bit.ly/11VG4ha
However, when I run my script (pasted at the end of the email), I notice
that there is a factor 2 between the values for the coefficients for the
categorical variable female calculated by my script and in the online
example.
Any idea about where this difference comes from?
Besides, how can I