search for: 800b

This isn't running in a child process, but this is a win32 machine. The problem I'm having is LegalizeOp is recursively calling itself 6 times, followed by 3 calls to ExpandEXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, with each LegalizeOp pushing 20KBof data onto the stack and Expand pushing 800B of data on the stack. So that is 9 function calls pushing ~140KB of data onto the stack. This set of 9 function calls repeats itself 25 times, pushing almost 3.5 MB of data onto the stack. This is occurring with v16i32 data type being converted to v4i32. If any larger vector integer data type w...

...opped. Has anyone successfully mounted the storage device in the libvirt. Having gone through the libvirt documentation, couldnt find further information of enabling the usb as storage device. Any pointers towards that would be useful. Host OS: IR800-GOS-1:~# lsusb Bus 001 Device 003: ID 8644:800b Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 IR800-GOS-1:~# Lxc app container: root@ir800-lxc:/mnt/usb# ls -la /dev/bus/usb/001/003 *crwx-*----- 1 root root 189, 2 Feb 3 01:44 /dev/bus/usb/001/003 ----------libvirt xml snippet ------------ <hostdev...

I''m trying to fill a token bucket with enough tokens to burst several gigs of data. However, it doesn''t seem to get any higher than ~3.9GB: >tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 1440kbit latency 50ms \ burst 16000000000 >tc qdisc show dev eth0 qdisc tbf 800b: rate 1440Kbit burst 3908420240b lat 2197.8s A smaller attempt of ~1.6 gigs works just fine: >tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 1440kbit latency 50ms \ burst 160000000 >tc qdisc show qdisc tbf 800c: dev eth0 rate 1440Kbit burst 156250Kb lat 48.8ms Is there any way around this? I hav...

...> gone through the libvirt documentation, couldnt find further information >> of >> enabling the usb as storage device. Any pointers towards that would be >> useful. >> >> >> Host OS: >> >> IR800-GOS-1:~# lsusb >> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 8644:800b >> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 >> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 >> IR800-GOS-1:~# >> >> Lxc app container: >> >> root@ir800-lxc:/mnt/usb# ls -la /dev/bus/usb/001/003 >> *crwx-*----- 1 root root 189, 2 Feb 3 01:44 >> /dev/...

...lowid 1:2 This was working as expected with 2.6.10 I''ve tried creating a proper 1:1 100Mbit parent to be the default but it didn''t help. And it was working fine without it on 2.6.10 With the 2.6.16 kernel I get results like # tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class htb 1:2 root leaf 800b: prio 0 quantum 25000 rate 2000Kbit ceil 2000Kbit burst 2600b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 2600b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 189796883 bytes 20626 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 3484Kbit 45pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 20627 borrowed: 0 giants: 30926 tokens: -9768 cto...

Hi, my system (solaris b77) was physically destroyed and i loosed data saved in a zpool mirror. The only thing left is a dettached vdev from the pool. I''m aware that uberblock is gone and that i can''t import the pool. But i still hope their is a way or a tool (like tct http://www.porcupine.org/forensics/) i can go too recover at least partially some data) thanks in advance for

Are you running with restricted stack size, e.g. in a pthread process? Evan On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > I’m hitting an issue where legalizeOp is overflowing the stack. Are > there any recommended ways of getting around this? > > The bitcode that causes this issue is attached. > > Thanks, > Micah Villmow > Systems Engineer > Advanced

...ted the storage device in the libvirt. Having >gone through the libvirt documentation, couldnt find further information of >enabling the usb as storage device. Any pointers towards that would be >useful. > > >Host OS: > >IR800-GOS-1:~# lsusb >Bus 001 Device 003: ID 8644:800b >Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 >Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 >IR800-GOS-1:~# > >Lxc app container: > >root@ir800-lxc:/mnt/usb# ls -la /dev/bus/usb/001/003 >*crwx-*----- 1 root root 189, 2 Feb 3 01:44 >/dev/bus/usb/001/003 > > > >--------...

I'm hitting an issue where legalizeOp is overflowing the stack. Are there any recommended ways of getting around this? The bitcode that causes this issue is attached. Thanks, Micah Villmow Systems Engineer Advanced Technology & Performance Advanced Micro Devices Inc. S1-609 One AMD Place Sunnyvale, CA. 94085 P: 408-749-3966 -------------- next part -------------- An

...sthrough* # lsusb Bus 04 Device 08: ID 0665:5161 Cypress Semiconductor USB to Serial Bus 04 Device 01: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 06 Device 01: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 05 Device 01: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 02 Device 02: ID 8644:800b Bus 02 Device 01: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 03 Device 01: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 01 Device 01: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.or...

On Jan 2, 2015, at 3:33 PM, Mike Raath <raathm at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, I messed up my reply a bit. > > The output of the lsusb command is the same before and after the data goes stale. > > $ lsusb -d 0665: > Bus 002 Device 005: ID 0665:5161 Cypress Semiconductor USB to Serial > OK. That usually means that the VM kernel doesn't see that the device is

I have a ZFS pool that has been corrupted. The pool contains a single device which was actually a file on UFS. The machine was accidentally halted and now the pool is corrupt. There are (of course) no backups and I''ve been asked to recover the pool. The system panics when trying to do anything with the pool. root@:/$ zpool status panic[cpu1]/thread=fffffe8000758c80: assertion failed:

Hello, I'm slightly off-topic here, but it is somewhat CentOS related! I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services. 1) Low power consumption (10-15W ... maybe 30W at most) 2) Must run Linux without too much fuss (CentOS or otherwise) 3) Must have two NICs (fast ethernet or better) 4) Memory

...0_Reg128:%vreg1 register: %vreg43 +[736r,752r:0) 752B%T1_X<def> = COPY %vreg43<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg43 768B%vreg44<def> = COPY %vreg1:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg44 R600_Reg128:%vreg1 register: %vreg44 +[768r,784r:0) 784B%T1_Y<def> = COPY %vreg44<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg44 800B%vreg45<def> = COPY %vreg1:sel_z; R600_Reg32:%vreg45 R600_Reg128:%vreg1 register: %vreg45 +[800r,816r:0) 816B%T1_Z<def> = COPY %vreg45<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg45 832B%vreg46<def> = COPY %vreg1:sel_w<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg46 R600_Reg128:%vreg1 register: %vreg46 +[832r,84...

...43 +[736r,752r:0) > 752B%T1_X<def> = COPY %vreg43<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg43 > 768B%vreg44<def> = COPY %vreg1:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg44 > R600_Reg128:%vreg1 > register: %vreg44 +[768r,784r:0) > 784B%T1_Y<def> = COPY %vreg44<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg44 > 800B%vreg45<def> = COPY %vreg1:sel_z; R600_Reg32:%vreg45 > R600_Reg128:%vreg1 > register: %vreg45 +[800r,816r:0) > 816B%T1_Z<def> = COPY %vreg45<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg45 > 832B%vreg46<def> = COPY %vreg1:sel_w<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg46 > R600_Reg128:%vreg1...

...> = COPY %vreg45; R600_Reg32:%vreg45 > 736B%vreg46<def> = COPY %vreg1:sel_w; R600_Reg32:%vreg46 R600_Reg128:%vreg1 > 752B%T1_W<def> = COPY %vreg46; R600_Reg32:%vreg46 > 768BRETURN > > 784BBB#3: derived from LLVM BB %41 > Predecessors according to CFG: BB#1 > 800B%vreg31<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_x; R600_Reg32:%vreg31 R600_Reg128:%vreg6 > 816B%vreg33<def> = IMPLICIT_DEF; R600_Reg128:%vreg33 > 832B%vreg32<def,tied1> = INSERT_SUBREG %vreg33<tied0>, %vreg31<kill>, sel_x; R600_Reg128:%vreg32,%vreg33 R600_Reg32:%vreg31 > 848B%v...

...R600_Reg128:%vreg1 720B%T1_Z<def> = COPY %vreg45; R600_Reg32:%vreg45 736B%vreg46<def> = COPY %vreg1:sel_w; R600_Reg32:%vreg46 R600_Reg128:%vreg1 752B%T1_W<def> = COPY %vreg46; R600_Reg32:%vreg46 768BRETURN 784BBB#3: derived from LLVM BB %41    Predecessors according to CFG: BB#1 800B%vreg31<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_x; R600_Reg32:%vreg31 R600_Reg128:%vreg6 816B%vreg33<def> = IMPLICIT_DEF; R600_Reg128:%vreg33 832B%vreg32<def,tied1> = INSERT_SUBREG %vreg33<tied0>, %vreg31<kill>, sel_x; R600_Reg128:%vreg32,%vreg33 R600_Reg32:%vreg31 848B%vreg34<def&gt...

...0233924-2635510394-514 sambaLMPassword: NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX sambaNTPassword: NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX sambaAcctFlags: [NUD ] sambaSID: S-1-5-21-2244683438-1300233924-2635510394-2998 loginShell: /bin/false structuralObjectClass: inetOrgPerson entryUUID: bf2688a6-2ee2-102f-800b-31ff3607ac6d creatorsName: cn=Manager,dc=internaltest createTimestamp: 20100728222518Z entryCSN: 20100728222518Z#000005#00#000000 modifiersName: cn=Manager,dc=internaltest modifyTimestamp: 20100728222518Z dn: cn=Domain Admins,ou=Groups,dc=internaltest objectClass: top objectClass: posixGroup objec...