Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "800000000e".
Did you mean:
800000000
2013 Feb 03
2
[LLVMdev] A bug in LLVM-GCC 4.2 with inlining __exchange_and_add
...return (EvActivate()).intrusive_from_this().get();
}
The problem is that the generated assembler looks like:_activate:00000000 b5f0 push {r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}00000002 af03 add r7, sp, #1200000004 e92d0d00 stmdb sp!, {r8, sl, fp}00000008 ed2d8b10 vstmdb sp!, {d8-d15}0000000c b094 sub sp, #800000000e f2405088 movw r0, :lower16:__ZN5boost10statechart6detail9id_holderI10EvActivateE11idProvider_E-0x24+0xfffffffc00000012 2300 movs r3, #000000014 f2c00000 movt r0, :upper16:__ZN5boost10statechart6detail9id_holderI10EvActivateE11idProvider_E-0x24+0xfffffffc00000018 f2407140 movw r1, :lower16:0x770...