search for: 7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux

Dear All, I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ At least those of us who still have important multi user machines running Linux. (Yes, me too, I do have a couple, thank goodness, the rest are already not ;-) Have a productive weekend, everybody. Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Departmen...

...Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, October 22, 2016 7:49 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: >> >> https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ >> >> At least those of us who still have important multi user machines running >> Linux. > > I should have said CentOS 7. Older ones (CentOS 6 and 5) are not vulnerable. Patch is out on RHEL side: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2098.html ***********************...

...Fri, October 28, 2016 9:43 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/22/2016 07:49 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: >> >> https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ >> >> At least those of us who still have important multi user machines >> running >> Linux. (Yes, me too, I do have a couple, thank goodness, the rest are >> already not ;-) >> >> Have a productive weekend, everybody. >> >> Valeri >> &gt...

On Sat, October 22, 2016 7:49 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Dear All, > > I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: > > https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ > > At least those of us who still have important multi user machines running > Linux. I should have said CentOS 7. Older ones (CentOS 6 and 5) are not vulnerable. > (Yes, me too, I do have a couple, thank goodness, the rest are > already not ;-) Luckily, no multi-user CentOS 7 m...

...gt; >> On Sat, October 22, 2016 7:49 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> >>> I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, >>> this: >>> >>> https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ >>> >>> >>> At least those of us who still have important multi user machines >>> running >>> Linux. >> >> I should have said CentOS 7. Older ones (CentOS 6 and 5) are not >> vulnerable. > > Patch is out on RHEL side: > &gt...

On 10/22/2016 07:49 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Dear All, > > I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: > > https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ > > At least those of us who still have important multi user machines running > Linux. (Yes, me too, I do have a couple, thank goodness, the rest are > already not ;-) > > Have a productive weekend, everybody. > > Valeri > And to close the book on this CVE, I just p...

...er 28, 2016 9:43 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/22/2016 07:49 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: >> >> https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos- >> 7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ >> >> At least those of us who still have important multi user machines >> running Linux. (Yes, me too, I do have a couple, thank goodness, the >> rest are already not ;-) >> >> Have a productive weekend, everybody. >> >> Valeri >> > >...

...7:49 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: >>>> >>>> https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtyco >>>> w-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ >>>> >>>> At least those of us who still have important multi user machines >>>> running >>>> Linux. >>>> >>> >>> I should have said CentOS 7. Older ones (CentOS 6 and 5) are not >>> vulnerable. >>> &gt...