Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "7m39s".
Did you mean:
7m31s
2016 Feb 05
2
MCJit Runtine Performance
Hi Keno,
Thanks for the fast ISel suggestion.
Here are the results (for a small but representational run):
LLVM 3.5.2 (old JIT): 4m44s
LLVM 3.7.1 (MCJit) no fast ISel: 7m31s
LLVM 3.7.1 (MCJit) fast ISel: 7m39s
So not much of a difference unfortunately.
On 05/02/16 11:05, Keno Fischer wrote:
> Yes, unfortunately, this is very much known. Over in the julia
> project, we've recently gone through this and taken the hit (after
> doing some work to fix the very extreme corner cases that we wer...
2016 Feb 05
2
MCJit Runtine Performance
...> wrote:
>
> Hi Keno,
>
> Thanks for the fast ISel suggestion.
>
> Here are the results (for a small but representational run):
>
> LLVM 3.5.2 (old JIT): 4m44s
>
> LLVM 3.7.1 (MCJit) no fast ISel: 7m31s
>
> LLVM 3.7.1 (MCJit) fast ISel: 7m39s
>
> So not much of a difference unfortunately.
>
>
> On 05/02/16 11:05, Keno Fischer wrote:
>> Yes, unfortunately, this is very much known. Over in the julia
>> project, we've recently gone through this and taken the hit
>> (after doing some...
2016 Feb 05
3
MCJit Runtine Performance
Hi All,
We recently upgraded a number of applications from LLVM 3.5.2 (old JIT)
to LLVM 3.7.1 (MCJit).
We made the minimum changes needed for the switch (no changes to the IR
generated or the IR optimizations applied).
The resulting code pass all tests (8000+).
However the runtime performance dropped significantly: 30% to 40% for
all applications.
The applications I am talking about