Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "7l5".
Did you mean:
75
2011 Dec 14
2
[LLVMdev] Failure to optimize ? operator
...riment with gcc I get identical code for the two functions:
==============================================
_f1: pushl %ebp xorl %eax, %eax movl
%esp, %ebp movl 8(%ebp), %edx testl %edx, %edx
jle L5 popl %ebp ret .p2align 4,,7L5:
movl %edx, %ecx imull %edx, %ecx popl %ebp
leal 3(%ecx,%ecx,4), %eax imull %edx, %eax
leal 1(%eax,%ecx,2), %eax ret .p2align 4,,15
_f2:
pushl %ebp xorl %eax, %eax movl %esp,
%ebp movl 8(%ebp), %edx ...
2011 Dec 14
0
[LLVMdev] Failure to optimize ? operator
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Brent Walker <brenthwalker at gmail.com> wrote:
> The following seemingly identical functions, get compiled to quite
> different machine code. The first is correctly optimized (the
> computation of var y is nicely moved into the else branch of the "if"
> statement), which the second one is not (the full computation of var y
> is
2011 Dec 13
4
[LLVMdev] Failure to optimize ? operator
The following seemingly identical functions, get compiled to quite
different machine code. The first is correctly optimized (the
computation of var y is nicely moved into the else branch of the "if"
statement), which the second one is not (the full computation of var y
is always done). The output was produced using the demo page on
llvm's web site (optimization level LTO).
Can
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...B_
zU2`923<+`{BqmZW53036o}G^b!3}am^>2`+=thW*heVGr?ix{v$9%z~DtM%fMAQl;
z1=`JK*44EIU++l at 3jZPsUtX%Buo}SAWWJzzsk|mxSkTE9qcik!WNm)Q{WEo`M=2&3
z^OW<>(S<oQ3RKA~T`sQ)whq1~CH)w5LJzD><wHG9-3J*=nh$0}Wd6R?C^st`+EZuB
z6`&W!4=bfUsHLTifKuAHFn(ug6Kj=}e>FziLej*di<H<xDfE_jU#`U7l5(%G<Aj)Z
z;>5gwxX@@RI7TWN0|jxkWZ_ at SXo6e)WHCI&=UQ%^v`6dzN=70vO>AyWopy9S_xp_f
zT~l1^hI~UI5cEx(piwfzdU+ at lBtmK3AEj4QQ0~Zo8&QQOY7JE=l=@|<mUI-qq at z^+
z4HT)i&9mIA at 6tvT+rzHa+yJQpjgk=^8Q8o!@8>e!zs-0*pYeWy-tW_>IiOB7CXIK6
z9?>Jb*~GfK%T?T4s5hsxZiTFacP0d>=xn{@PKlZng...