Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "7f698e51".
2010 Mar 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM tries to remove labels used in blockaddress()
On Mar 15, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Bob Wilson wrote:
>>> An earlier revision simply generated asm-code, where the appropriate label was missing, thus causing gcc to fail when i wanted to compile the asm-file.
>>
>> Here is a slightly reduced testcase:
>>
>> define i8* @test1() nounwind {
>> entry:
>> ret i8* blockaddress(@test_fun, %test_label)
>> }
2010 Mar 15
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM tries to remove labels used in blockaddress()
On Mar 15, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2010, at 7:11 AM, Sebastian Schlunke wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i ran into a problem when using blockaddress() with a label in another function. It seems to me that LLVM tries to remove the label used in blockaddress because it seems like it is not used, but in fact it may be used somewhere with a