Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "7emwh".
Did you mean:
7eh
2011 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] Best location in code generation for insertion of instrumentation to measure stack depth?
On 7/8/11 4:09 PM, Andrew Ruef wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I am trying to implement the technique outlined in the following
> paper: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mwh/papers/martin10ownership.html
> <http://www.cs.umd.edu/%7Emwh/papers/martin10ownership.html> in LLVM.
> My approach so far involves the use of an IR level transform (via
> runOnFunction) to identify memory loads and stores. One thing I need
> to do (I am pretty sure I need to do it at least) is automatically
> mark each stack frame as "...
2011 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Best location in code generation for insertion of instrumentation to measure stack depth?
Hi list,
I am trying to implement the technique outlined in the following paper:
http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mwh/papers/martin10ownership.html in LLVM. My
approach so far involves the use of an IR level transform (via
runOnFunction) to identify memory loads and stores. One thing I need to do
(I am pretty sure I need to do it at least) is automatically mark each stack
frame as "owned" by the
2011 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] Best location in code generation for insertion of instrumentation to measure stack depth?
...is.edu>> wrote:
>
> On 7/8/11 4:09 PM, Andrew Ruef wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I am trying to implement the technique outlined in the following
>> paper: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mwh/papers/martin10ownership.html
>> <http://www.cs.umd.edu/%7Emwh/papers/martin10ownership.html> in
>> LLVM. My approach so far involves the use of an IR level
>> transform (via runOnFunction) to identify memory loads and
>> stores. One thing I need to do (I am pretty sure I need to do it
>> at least) is automatically ma...
2011 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Best location in code generation for insertion of instrumentation to measure stack depth?
I investigated the MachineFunctionPass (that is runOnMachineFunction, I
believe). In my experimentation it didn't seem that the MachineFrameInfo was
populated (it consistently said that the stack depth was 0, for example). I
might have been doing something wrong?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:21 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote:
> On 7/8/11 4:09 PM, Andrew Ruef wrote: