Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "7ededbee".
Did you mean:
7ede5bee
2017 Aug 19
2
RFC: Resolving TBAA issues
...— a char or unsigned char type.
>
>
>
> This is not going to end up with a different result in this case.
>
> Do you agree?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170819/7ededbee/attachment.html>
2017 Aug 19
3
RFC: Resolving TBAA issues
Daniel, Hal,
I'm trying to figure out what we would need to do in terms of the
current approach, accepting its limitations, to support unions, member
arrays, aggregate accesses and type identifiers and what I get looks
suspiciously simple. Can you please check it out and let me know if I'm
missing something?
For unions:
TBAA, regardless of a specific approach, cannot guarantee