Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "7e6f9b90".
Did you mean:
7e6f9000
2016 Feb 23
2
[RFC] Error handling in LLVM libraries.
...________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160223/7e6f9b90/attachment.html>
2016 Feb 18
2
[RFC] Error handling in LLVM libraries.
> I like this idea in general. It's a better implementation of what
> ErrorOr originally was before we removed the custom error support
> because it wasn't used. In fact I would actually support outright
> replacing ErrorOr with this if it can be done safely, as I find the
> name TypedErrorOr a bit long.
The main differences are
* This will hopefully be used.
*